use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
Users of Saidit: Should subs that don't violate the rules be removed from s/all by the admins?
submitted 2 years ago by Dragonerne from self.AskSaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (26 children)
I don't like s/debatealtright, but so long as yall don't censor opposing opinions high on the Pyramid of Debate — which I have yet to see — yall should be in s/all. The other admins disagree, obviously, but yall ain't broke the rules as they're written.
[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (3 children)
Glad, thanks for saying so.
We've been around the block enough to know we will be censored no matter what eventually. So it's not something we aren't used to. But, frankly, we like SaidIt. We want to stay and want to help improve it. But we also like non-alt-right visitors. If we need to change rules or something to get others into the conversation then we are open to that
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (2 children)
We've been around the block enough to know we will be censored no matter what eventually.
Yall are originally from Reddit, right?
If we need to change rules or something to get others into the conversation then we are open to that
I ain't got no authority to make decisions like that, but I'd let yall on s/all as is.
[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Yes. All mods and most users, at least
I ain't got no authority
I know, I was just speaking hypothetically
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
That's what I thought.
[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
i feel like all should be based on the top three best voted posts in a sub. That way it doesn't get overrun by one sub.
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
That's a good solution. I personally prefer the way traditional forums do stuff, where the front page is just a list of topics, and posts are sorted by new.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (19 children)
The mods should have to win 1 debate against the sub. That won’t happen.
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (18 children)
One can't debate with retards who can't follow a logical argument, so debate against that sub is not possible.
[–]Dragonerne[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (17 children)
Haha, post nose, my guy. What's the chances of you being a jew?
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (16 children)
See what I mean?
[–]Dragonerne[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago* (15 children)
Are you a jew or not? Edit: See what I mean? ;)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (1 child)
Yes he is Jewish. He’s told me in previous posts.
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (0 children)
Apparently he has tried getting one of our subs banned previously. Not that surprising that he calls our sub "retarded"
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (12 children)
What does that have to do with my point? Whether or not you guys are retards has nothing to do with whether I am a jew.
In addition, your question is ambiguous. One can be religiously/culturally jewish or one can be racially jewish. I assume mean racially just because you retards are too stupid to understand religion or culture. But you still should say what you mean.
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (11 children)
The point is to show why you would smear our sub with disgusting language.
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (10 children)
I was simply reciprocating with the language that members of your sub used with me. I guess the general sequence goes like this:
After such a sequence, how can there be any doubt that your sub is populated by morons who deserve to be insulted?
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (9 children)
So far the only one using slurs and insults is you. Do you have an example of your fantasy conversation from our sub? Or is it the typical jewish behaviour that we are seeing in action?
You either lie intentionally or you've fallen for jewish propaganda about us.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (26 children)
[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (2 children)
[–]cisheteroscum 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (19 children)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (18 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (17 children)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (16 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (15 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (12 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (11 children)
[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (10 children)
[–]Dragonerne[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)