you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (6 children)

Using u/Chipit as a reference is in and of itself, woefully misguided. There is nothing worthy of referring to in his posts.

You and him do more damage to saidit's reputation than Node ever could.

Yes, Node's humor is edgy, but mostly harmless. He did go over the line once, but it was for a good cause.

[–]Chipit 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You neither addressed nor refuted anything that was said.

"he doesn't make death threats"

Screenshots of death threats

change the subject

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Using u/Chipit as a reference is in and of itself, woefully misguided. There is nothing worthy of referring to in his posts.

Agreed.

You and him do more damage to saidit's reputation than Node ever could.

Disagree.

Blame M7 for his moderator choice, don't blame TAM who's doing the best she can, shaky as it is at times. It's due to their youth, inexperience, and tone-deafness not your other excuses. You're far from perfect nor a fair judge. We were all young once and IMO she deserves a chance to learn and improve.

Yes, Node's humor is edgy, but mostly harmless. He did go over the line once, but it was for a good cause.

Agreed. IMO, he crossed the line twice - and that's only in the examples I did see. There is no good cause for violence.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There is no good cause for violence.

I agree, but this is a website. There is no violence on websites. There can be, at worst, representations of violence, both literary and visually. But that's it and frankly even those visual representations of violence are on OTHER sites that can get linked here. So what does this have to do with edgy-humored posts?

If I ever meet you or even see you in the distance, I will aim at you and SHOOT. With my camera. And I will SNAP you. With a shot. And CAPTURE you. In image.

Geddityet? None of this is violent. The violence is IN YOUR MIND.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I already understand.

The rule is not against violence. The rule is against advocating violence.

There is a rule against porn and against advocating violence because there's already more than enough reason to target SaidIt.

You know this.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What if I violently shoot, snap and capture you?

With a camera of course.

Wait, maybe somebody could construe the above as stating that I would use a gun to injure you, break your bones and put you in cuffs and kidnap you, all the while having a camera on me. See? With that kind of mentality, pretty much anything can be construed as calling for violence. Please don't stretch.

But frankly I think I might be done with this site. Too much damn drama, and you lefties have obviously taken control and take the side of censorship. That's all that needs to be said, really.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

See, when I write "please don't stretch" I actually mean, please stop tying me to a rack and torturing me.

Therefore I denounce YOUR violence.

Of course these are demented statements. But we live in a time of mass insanity.