you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

Are you just trying to stir up drama?

You let leftist shit fill up the front page without issues

The removal of spam and bots doesn't fit you political agenda? Gimme a break.

Didn't you come in with IP2 where all they did was call each other nigger like a bunch of 13 year olds?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

The removal of spam and bots doesn't fit you political agenda? Gimme a break.

don't misrepresent me. I love that spam and bot content is removed. I offered to help do it.

Didn't you come in with IP2 where all they did was call each other nigger like a bunch of 13 year olds?

no, i didn't. I was here long before them. But keep up with your dehumanising and attempts to label me so that you can then justify your bad behaviours.

spam and bot content should be removed. But when you start removing straightforward, pyramid compliant discussions because you don't like the people posting them, then you have gone too far and become yet another power tripping admin. So cliche

[–]fred_red_beans 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

I not going to justify shit to you. Nor do I care what you have to say.

There's something wrong with you.

Looks like your just trying to stir up drama.

Why don't you go complain to someone else?

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

says the man who just tried to smear me. cool moves, bro.

[–]fred_red_beans 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

I don't care.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no, because integrity isn't your thing.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Tried to smear you, ended up smearing me lol

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

/u/d3rr, imho you’re the most rational and the last member of the team I find approachable on SaidIt staff. Can you please speak to the rest of the team about them being above and acting more mature than regular users, having more responsibility, not inciting more drama by attempting to insult one and insulting another or more, and lastly, going tit for tat with other users?

I just got hit in cross-fire because an admin was trying to insult someone else (and tbh, I don’t agree with Bobby very often.. but I feel this comment thread is a perfect example of the tit for tat attitude admins here have that need to disappear).

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks for the vote of confidence man but I quit admining a while back. Admins should be held to a higher standard, and the tit for tat stuff is toxic. Policy and code is too much for me, so I wash my hands of all policy shit.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I remember that, but you’re still a respected part of the team, m7 would lend you his earn concerning this wouldn’t he? And asking your admins to act professional, not go tit for tat/bite bait/sink down to a user’s level and actually try to insult them, isn’t that much of an ask and would go a long way.

I understand if you feel it’s not your problem anymore though. Thanks for even responding lol. I hope you’re doing well!

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I donno, this admin slandered IP2 but I feel like m7 is desperate for admin help for combating the spam problem. If I'm gonna stir up the drama I need a really solid case. I spent 2 years of my life trying to steer site policy, all I did was make everyone and myself miserable.

I think I'm doing okay, thanks. Being on saidit at 3:25am might say otherwise.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel, hear and don’t blame you. It isn’t your prerogative at all. Sorry to get you dragged into this, and I hope you get the rest you need, fr.

I just wanna say, this has nothing to do with him slandering IP2; it has to do with the constant tit for tat behavior among admins with users - if a user attacks one admin and sinks to a low level, the admin will attack back and sink just as low when they’re supposed to be holding the ship together and acting professional.

If they feel so negatively about this user and their comment(s), (unless it’s to help them as they should or remove the comments that violate our rules, professionally as an admin), why are they not ignoring comments instead of going tit for tat and sinking to low levels? Levels even I wouldn’t sink to?

That’s the problem. Not slandering IP2, fk that, my feefees are fine. It’s the toxic tit for tat behavior that’s been going on non-stop for the past month that creates more drama than it solves & the og problem itself.

This was just an example of it; I’m the IP2 user, but he was attempting to use it to attack bob because he thought bob was from the community originally, and I don’t agree with bob often either. I got hit in the crossfire despite not being involved in the convo, admins have been behaving this way for a month now, who else will get hit in crossfire and what other drama will actually arise at the hand of our admins/pr? I hope others realize that too if they read this.

Anyway, be well bruh, again, thanks 4 even responding! Sorry to hear you’re wiped!

Edit: and thanks for all you do!