you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think it's just sexualized children's underwear.

[–]Klenvastergan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It's not really sexualized.

The man and woman are neither shockingly attractive nor behaving sexually, they're just standing there in underwear that is about as non-sexual as modern underwear gets.

Boxer shorts for grown men with stupid shit on them have a rich and proud tradition.

[–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That is a pic of a little boy and a little girl.

[–]Klenvastergan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, well that's kinda weird.