you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]tomatosplat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    I think it's just sexualized children's underwear.

    [–]Klenvastergan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    It's not really sexualized.

    The man and woman are neither shockingly attractive nor behaving sexually, they're just standing there in underwear that is about as non-sexual as modern underwear gets.

    Boxer shorts for grown men with stupid shit on them have a rich and proud tradition.

    [–]tomatosplat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    That is a pic of a little boy and a little girl.

    [–]Klenvastergan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh, well that's kinda weird.