all 6 comments

[–]magnora7 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You can just post in /s/coronavirus maybe

Unlike reddit, we allow both sides of the discussion on a given topic, so you can actually just use the main subs for that topic

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

unless its hydrogen as a fuel, in which case the sub owner will ban you if you don't agree with him about how viable/green it is.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

/s/LockdownSkepticism exists. So does /s/FuckMasks, /s/NoNewNormal and /s/VaccineSkepticism.

Also:

I expect a Great Reset sub eventually, redundant with a distinct difference.

I appreciate this post because someone is actually discussing the future of subs instead of just making them willy-nilly. (That's the first time I've ever used that word, written or said.) For over 2 years I was trying to engage the community in discussing subs organization and management to no avail. I'd say it's generally too late to clean it up, but maybe there's a good reason to continue forward with intention rather than chaos.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    has there been a voat exodus recently? It was hardly ever mentioned, and now it seems that every thread has someone talking about it like any of us should care

    [–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    act, don't talk.

    [–]Pis-dur 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I'd find Covid19 sub concentrated on only studies. Or reddit there r/Covid19 which has this purpose. Just my 5 cents to the discussion.