you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

    You do realize that "Polarising perspective" article is pointing out that the official narrative represents fallacious binary thinking, don't you?

    What makes you think WikiSpooks made that chart I've already seen a million times?

    What makes you think the chart is not accurate in the official narrative view?

    What makes you think one bad (in your opinion) article is representative of an entire site?

    If you can improve WikiSpooks, I'm quite sure that /u/Robin would be happy to have you join as a contributing editor.

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

      IMO, you should join Wikispooks and contribute on occasion, as much or as little as you see fit.

      [–][deleted]  (8 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

        Even better, let us all know. Convince others (worthy) to join. And post the articles you contributed to in /s/WikiSpooks and/or other topical subs. And/or hash out ideas here to post there. I will be doing that more in the new year, after I finish my first draft of my "epic" story.

        [–][deleted]  (6 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

          I look forward to all the feedback I can get, good, bad, and ugly - to improve the project for the next stages.

          [–][deleted]  (4 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

            And that's why you're one of my SaidIt /s/friends, even if we don't always agree, I can still respect your perspective.