you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

And according to Michelle Metta's book–little read, and the information it exposes even moreso little cared about–that the real players behind the United States of America Inc., (as it is a corporation) were fascist Freemasons, liberalism for their sake was simply utilized to exploit the laborer for their incorporated lodges and haughty brothers. Every Freemasonic lodge is incorporated. All the 18th century charters of the lodges prove that the lodge was set-up as a protection racket just as the United States was.

Look at all the persons at the constitutional conventions. Nearly all of them were land speculators, bankers, and corporate lawyers. Jefferson lost the bid and the real players involved in creating the corporate empire you now have today were the immoralists mentioned above.

Who killed JFK, and who got away with it. Who did 9/11, and who got away with it? Two factions. The Freemasonic Fascists of the Scottish Rite (Jewish Rite); the former p-2 lodge of Gelli, now the covert p-3 lodge in Italy that accompanies CIA agents who work hand-in-hand with the Likudnik revisionist Zionists in Israel, of whom although might have emigrated from communist Russia to Israel are far from the Bolshevik communists of the 1917 revolution and yet they are so similar.

Why kill JFK for simply trying to use diplomatic means to solve geopolitical issues in conflict with communist states? Look at the p-2 freemasons protocols that both the North and Southern districts of US freemasonry signed unto. The protocols prove that Freemasons are totally against peasantry co-opts and decentralized socialism and totally for Fascism and corporatization.

There's one thing the conspiracy books really never mention and that is Freemasonic fascism aligned with the Likudniks. All they really talk about is communism. Yuri Benzmenov was probably right on many things, one could even make the contention that Fascism, at least in the case of Mussoliniynism is just another form of collectivist authoritarianist communism, but what I find far more compelling then the contraindications of fascism and communism and even capitalism is how many times their revolutionary tendencies align together. One using the other for their own geopolitical and exploitative goals. It very much seems like the work in stride to fool the people.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Thesis, countering antithesis, and the final synthesis for they actual results they wanted all along.

Also, https://DuckDuckGo.com/?q=Mafiya (not a typo) the authentic Russiagate they won't look at (dynamic silence) (Also, The Antedote [sic] touches on this often enough.)

Also, also, How much do you think Thomas Paine was played into writing the Constitution?

Also, also, also, I don't know why I didn't think of this sooner... You should create /s/LimitedHangouts. It's further down on my list - but you are the master of remembering who is compromised and when and how, whether in part, speculative, or a complete sell out. If I wasn't into openness I'd almost go so far as to limit it somehow so that you can post and others can only comment and/or request other names to be added. If you were able to control the chaos, limited or not, I'd wager that could be among the most important research subs on SaidIt. Then again, maybe it might be better somehow integrated with WikiSpooks.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Hey now that sounds fascist: Free speech for some but not for others. But I jest. Too many morons pollute the air too much with their "free speech" that should really be used for "free STFU and LEARN SOMETHING for a change"... ;-)

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I know you joke, but I wouldn't mind some limits in order to get better quality content. For example, if only Jesus made the posts he could edit and update them as people commenting to their hearts content, some good, some bad, could be filtered into the original post. Then I realized that would essentially be closer to a WikiSpooks article. Still, I think it's a decent idea, at least until we get more SaidIt-WikiSpooks crossover happening.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I agree 100%. It's a great idea. It would be like a text-based Youtube channel.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I guess. Kinda. The more I think about it the lamer the "limits" seem. But I still think Jesus would make the best /s/LimitedHangouts ever.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.