you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They stuck together and promoted from within, it's not the good kind of merit, we shouldn't allow nepotism or corruption or being sneaky

[–]Rationalmind 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

They stuck together? What? That sounds conspiratorial, and I don’t mean in a constructive way. Nepotism isn’t great, but also I get that human relationships mean that who you know gives you access to opportunity. People, like you and me tend to do things for our friends and family as opposed to strangers. This happens throughout human social relationships because it’s natural. Corruption is bad, yes, we agree there, but I’ll go out on a limb and say that the Supreme Court is not corrupt compared to like Congress. Why does being Jewish associated with “nepotism” and “corruption” and “being sneaky?” I don’t believe in stereotyping people based on a form of identity because it is confirmation bias. Confirmation bias means that you see someone who fits your stereotype which reinforces your belief in said stereotype. Then you ignore and dismiss someone who doesn’t fit your stereotype.

Arguably Kavanaugh, who is Catholic, is the quintessential example of the very issue you loathe. He’s a mediocre, nepotism hire as a result of the good ole’ boys network. He went to a top Ivy League university where he did poorly but through his connections, he became a judge. You don’t seem to have a problem with him? This is confirmation bias.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why does being Jewish associated with “nepotism” and “corruption” and “being sneaky?”

Like attracts like. Jewish people hire and promote their own people. This is further reinforced by the narrative that the whole world is against them and they have to stick together.

Which is, ironically, caused by the Jewish trait of hiring and promoting their own people.

[–]america_first_1776 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source on Kavenaugh being "mediocre" and doing poorly in college/law school? You understand how tough it is to get into those schools to begin with, right?

And as popper already pointed out, the increase of Jews in the SC shows that they don't have to hide their hand anymore. The Jews use to just hide what their influence was by paying them off and not being actually seen (like the Rothschilds). EVEN IF only 8 have been on the Supreme Court, they're still over 2x their percent of the overall population by today's standards. Why do I say "today's standards." Well, as it turns out, there weren't many Jews at all in the U.S. till their population booms in 1900 and 1920. And unlike you, I'll actually post a source about that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_the_United_States

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

conspiratorial because it is a conspiracy, a proven one. they're sneaky, not a stereotype but a fact. They own everything. Including trump, so he put in kavanaugh, in the end it was because of jews and he will vote along with them, never overturn roe v wade guaranteed.

[–]Rationalmind 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is not the definition of conspiracy.