you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

What trouble could there possibly be?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Copyright strike is the main one he is thinking about I guess.

If I were the OP I wouldn't really give a fuck, but If he can't afford this I'd advise him to just DM one of the admins

[–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Could it be fear (false evidence appearing real)? Could it be a guilty conscience? Would help the brother if possible yet it seems as if speculation may be what one seeks.

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    (In most countries,) If they don't CLEARLY/EXPLICITLY tell that the logo isn't copyrighted, then the default position is that you have to ask the permission (copyrighted by default, even If in their minds they didn't care at that time). I know it sucks, but "that's the law" :/ .

    [–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Failed to figure out the trouble or is the trouble only in the mind and the manner in which one deals with all real parties of interest in the moment?

    Could the only consideration be: is attorney accepting liability in the matter?

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Layman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      If attorney is not willing to sacrifice then what credibility could there be? Would it make sense to speak with the one making and accepting liability for the claim as opposed to an alleged representative? Could It be barratry if attorney is seeking to manufacture controversy?