you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Probably not. He's trying to get the admins to draw a firm line as to where paedophilia begins and ends and on what basis.

Is it based on what is legally allowable in your country?

Or is it based on something more arbitrary (i.e. morals)?

I get the impression that d3rr and magnora7's stance is a moral one and I agree with that.

And I would rather not get involved in a debate about kiddy fucking.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Tiwaking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Ahh so you and I have come to the same conclusion about morals and ethics.

    "My stance is that people who want to remove peoples ability to vote shouldnt be allowed to vote"

    I support their moral stance against kiddy fucking because I agree with it.

    Enforcing moralistic and subjective rules by consensus is something that all good citizens have a duty to perform.

    This is why I didnt want to get into a debate about kiddy fucking because the morality of kidding fucking is WTF.

    [–]basedaf1 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    the morality of defending Jews in Nazi Germany was also pretty WTF if you ask me