I have used every free online image creator. They are shit.

submitted by [deleted] from (self.Artificial_Intelligen)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm not doing more than a prompt on a web page

Okay but if you're using someone else's expensive gfx cards, then why is it weird that they don't want gore or porn. Think about it. If you spent $50k on exposing graphics cards to the internet, would you want them used for someone's gore.

Apparently the services you're using - no, they don't want you making gore. So host your own, or find another.

I'm most concerned with yet doesn't work. I use simple equivalent language, and all I get is a collage of crap

Okay then you're doing it wrong.

You're supposed to put in text that matches the labels for the training imagery.

If some random internet publisher, posts online a photo of cats playing chess, and that photo ends up in the stable diffusion training set - then you as the SD prompt typist, need to type something similar to what the random publisher would have typed. And they typically aren't using "simple equivalent language".

I would suggest you take a few minutes to learn how the technology works, instead of assuming you already know it, and blunder around doing it wrong

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Okay so everyone else, thousands and thousands of people, use it just fine, but it's vaporware because you didn't spent five minutes figuring it out. Okay bro

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Once again you're living up to your username.

      If you use a1111 webui, the rng seed is a field you can edit directly. If you find a picture you like, you can make small edits with the same seed number and it 'just works'.

      So it's not spinning the wheel. You can use ControlNet, re-use a seed number, and inpaint/outpaint.... it's as fine control as if you were holding a pen.

      Thousands of people are already using it in the way you're describing.

      The fact that you haven't spent five minutes figuring it out - is a failure with you, not the engineering