J. D. Vance Is Wrong. Donald Trump Was No Antiwar President.

submitted by Drewski from jacobin.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-middle-east-peace-deals-what-to-know

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/483676-donald-trump-is-ending-endless-war/

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-middle-east-peace-deals-what-to-know

https://apnews.com/article/peace-process-israel-iran-united-arab-emirates-jerusalem-c87ca011c2cd4321d587e9684dfb84e1

https://thehill.com/opinion/international/483676-donald-trump-is-ending-endless-war/

How did that work out?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Oh, the Presidency was stolen from him, and a career politician was installed to continue the bidding of the WEF and world Central Banks.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, the Presidency was stolen from him

Oh was it?

He should have taken 62 different cases to court.

On second thoughts, that would be stupid. Any lawyers involved would face discipline for their “historic and profound abuse of the judicial process”.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You asked. I told you. Question! Are you playing dumb? Or are you really this stupid? Doesn't matter, because either way you are still just a useful idiot.

On second thoughts, that would be stupid. Any lawyers involved would face discipline for their “historic and profound abuse of the judicial process”.

Yes. The whole system is corrupt.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You asked. I told you

No, I asked how Trump ending the Afghanistan war worked out.

You changed the subject.

Are you playing dumb?

One of us it.

Yes. The whole system is corrupt.

Oh for fuck's sake. The lawsuits were ridiculous.

Many were chucked by Trump-appointed Judges, and he didn't look at adequacy of experience. Just extreme political bias.

Even the current SCOTUS, stacked as it is with federalist society activists, rejected the whacko conspiracy theory based suits.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

OH I see. So these two sentence mean the same thing. Got it!

How did that work out?

No, I asked how Trump ending the Afghanistan war worked out.

Regardless of what you meant by that first Question. The answer remains the same. Me answer you, isn't me changing the topic. The election being stolen, is how that worked out.

As for you bringing up lawsuits unprompted? That's what it looks like to change the subject. And no, it doesn't disprove the fact that elections have been rigged since the time JFK was assassination by the C.I.A. The only presidents not members of the uni-party since JFK's death have been Nixon, Reagan, and Trump.