OK - if we can stop focusing on Biden as a Bond villain, let's look at the bombing in the appropriately broad context, which extends back several decades. After the "Cold War" (if it really ended), c. 1990, the US military complex continued to offer support for 3rd-world and developing countries that wanted regime change or other kinds of US support. This became an income stream for those countries, even if some of the support was in goods and services. To keep that support from drying up, many in those countries continued their religious wars, genocide &c (though many in the conflicts were not looking at the geopolitical rationale of their leaders). For the US military industrial compled this was a win - win. They had a new reason to exist (at great expense to the tax payer), while also fomenting war abroad, and and as those conflicts began to involve wealthier countries (for various reasons that would require an essay), those wealthier countries would buy trillions in military technology from the US. Rinse, repeat.

Did the Bden Administration do anything to stop this trend by the US mlitary industrial complex. It seems: no. That said, they did continue with the pull-out of Afghanistan - at great political cost - which must have pissed off the military. Repuglicans who continually called for the pull-out are now saying that Biden single-handedly fucked up, because we should have stayed in Afghanistan. The BIGGEST problem with American politics is that so many voters forget about their own history, as they have the attention spans of a gnat in heat.