you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

don't fall for it! the saudis of the 911 were mostly found alive later and it is obvious they were just used like crisis actors at most. the main reason they used saudis is to make the 'osama did 911' lie plausible, because he was a cia asset since the days of the afghani mujahedeen movement. brzezinski was responsible for that.

imo, there were no planes on 911 at all, they just used explosives and a technique called video overlay to photoshop planes on video footage. no planes, no hijackers, just controlled demolition. clean and simple.

that's why they didn't scramble any fighter jets, the pilots in those would see the truth - that there are no hijacked planes..

rand paul, just like his father is a controlled opposition, a jesuit operative and a freemason. this is luckily an obvious disinfo, showing for real who he is serving. even his mother is an eastern star member. ron paul is also a 911 denier.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

that there are no hijacked planes..

The FBI investigation into the Pentagon attack was called PentBomb. Not pentplane.

I think planes were used as a cover, and flown remotely. No terrorist pilots.

If they faked the planes then they would look more similar to United planes.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, no drones or drones. Does it matter? Both aspects mean the plane narrative is a psyop.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree it doesn't matter. Very similar to the JFK assassination.

Layers on layers on layers.