Senator Rand Paul: Hmmm....15 Saudis attack us on 9/11. The Saudi government kills a US journalist. A Saudi pilot in training kills 3 of our soldiers. Can anyone spot the common thread? My take: It’s way past time to quit arming and training the Saudis!

submitted by Drewski from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I still think the simpler explanation is a real plane. We're talking like 10 camera angles, some of which only came out years later. And lots of eye witnesses saw the second plane.

I'll look into the plane shaped hole. From what I remember the major structural beams were mostly left intact.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

and if planes then they were something remote controlled?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I found something on the wing impact damage. They're saying the wings didn't cut through steel. To me it looks like they kinda did, but it naturally fades out as you get closer to the tip. It has some good pictures at least. http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.com/2014/07/911-no-planes-fail-blog-dr-judy-wood.html

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now, if a drone did hit, and we know they RIGGED THE TOWERS with nano-thermite, larger explosives and detcord, would they really want to fly a drone into a building thus possibly destorying the wiring of the buidign with explosives? I'm playing devils advocate here. How could they ensure that the drone would not mess up the placement of the explosives? Maybe they used nano-thermite to cut the steel jsut below the plane impacts and then a few sotires below used regular demo charges, idk?