you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I found something on the wing impact damage. They're saying the wings didn't cut through steel. To me it looks like they kinda did, but it naturally fades out as you get closer to the tip. It has some good pictures at least. http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.com/2014/07/911-no-planes-fail-blog-dr-judy-wood.html

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

well i agree that judy wood is unreliable. but i thought so is the nist report. i also like the comments, found this there, i don't remember seeing it before (missile at the pentagon?):

http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/5dbc426c4403.gif

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

^ DUDE, theat video is fake, you knwo that right. It was debuked a long tiem ago. Why are you pushing that?

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no, i did not know it is fake. how and why is it fake anyway? and i am not 'pushing' anything, don't bite my head off! :-)

you mean nothing hit the pentagon, and they simply detonated explosives that they previously installed?

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now, if a drone did hit, and we know they RIGGED THE TOWERS with nano-thermite, larger explosives and detcord, would they really want to fly a drone into a building thus possibly destorying the wiring of the buidign with explosives? I'm playing devils advocate here. How could they ensure that the drone would not mess up the placement of the explosives? Maybe they used nano-thermite to cut the steel jsut below the plane impacts and then a few sotires below used regular demo charges, idk?

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    yeah they're debunking her.. i guess the title looks misleading hahaaa

    [–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    yes, at first i wrote a whole comment, only to delete it a few seconds later :-)