Former top Navy SEAL who oversaw the Osama bin Laden raid says the US is 'under attack from the president'

submitted by IamRedBeard from businessinsider.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shivashivashiva 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

its rumored osama bin laden died years before this "raid"... considering the "raid" is a hoax, the "media" makes heros from puppets, real cute!

[–]IamRedBeard[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Conservatives : "Anything I don't like is a Hoax or fake news! Blah Blah Blah Blah I'm four years old and have my fingers in my ears I can't hear you Blah Blah Blah everything is fake!"

Your cop out is weak you child.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part 3

In July 2002, Time Magazine reports that "intelligence officials are not certain whether Osama bin Laden is alive or dead" but that "they have found a tantalizing document that suggests he was living at least as recently as the last days of December [of 2001]." Link:

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1002840,00.html

In July 2002, The New York Times runs another article on how Osama bin Laden is likely dead. The author notes how unusual it would be for bin Laden, known for his constant desire for media attention, would be silent for over half a year. Link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/11/opinion/the-death-of-bin-ladenism.html

October 2002: Intelligence Officials Confirm bin Laden is Dead; bin Laden's Will is Released Also in October 2002 the D.C.-based news service The World Tribune, citing **Israeli intelligence sources, reports that the United States and Israel have concluded that bin Laden died in Afghanistan in December 2001. They note that additional bin Laden messages are "probably fabrications," and that bin Laden's heir has been chosen.

[One should be well aware that Mossad and 7th floor agencies within the US government including the Lukidnik, Israeli aligned neoconservative (neotrotskyite) think tanks did NOT WANT TO invade Afghanistan. Instead, they pushed for intervention in Iraq, the ousting of Saddam and called for ground troops and targeted airstrikes in Palestine. They called for all of this on the day of 9/11 before anyone knew what had happened or who was responsible. William and Irving Kristol, his father stated that they didn't care about Afghanistan. In fact, many of the PNACers didn't care about Afghanistan. So, it makes perfect sense that there were multiple agendas when it came to the 9/11 launch pad into the Global War on Terror. Afghanistan was a sidepiece that was effectively about taken out the Taliban to allow for pipelines, pushed by UNESCO.] Link:

http://web.archive.org/web/20021205223313/http://216.26.163.62/2002/me_terrorism_10_16.html

The president of Afghanistan also concludes that bin Laden is probably dead:

"The more we don't hear of him, and the more time passes, there is the likelihood that he probably is either dead or seriously wounded somewhere." Link:

http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/

In October 2002 CNN reports that U.S. intelligence officials have obtained Osama bin Laden's will, which is dated December 14, 2001 (approximately the same date as has been reported bin Laden's funeral in Tora Bora by Fox News and other outlets). CNN also reports that there has been no evidence of bin Laden since December of 2001. Link:

http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/10/26/binladen.will/

2002 Onwards: Efforts to Target bin Laden are Closed Down; bin Laden = "Elvis" In 2004, the LA Times quotes Donald Rumsfeld (who mixes up Hussein with bin Laden) as admitting: "We've not seen him [bin Laden] on a video since 2001." Link:

http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=9-11/binladen/death/rumsfeld-says-no-clues-to-bin-laden-since-2001.txt

In 2006 the New York Times reports the CIA had officially closed down the unit focused on capturing bin Laden the previous year. Link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/washington/04intel.html?ex=1309665600&en=3779ed9b98bb9d22&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

In 2006, U.S. and Pakistani officials say they have not received any information about bin Laden in years:

"no tips from informants, no snippets from electronic intercepts, no points on any satellite image."

The article rehashes the December 2001 video of bin Laden as the most recent evidence (other than a second-hand claim from 2003) of bin Laden's existence. Some commandos are now giving Osama bin Laden the codename "Elvis." Link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/09/AR2006090901105.html

The available reports overwhelmingly supports the view that bin Laden died of kidney failure in December of 2001. We have mainstream media reports from a variety of sources, and zero credible evidence since then, as admitted by top level offiicals. Even if you believe the official story, the evidence very strongly suggests some entity (either the CIA, Saudi Royal Family, the Pakistani government, or all the above) helped bin Laden survive long enough via medical treatments to be killed at a later point in time. This very well could be the "one big lie" Seymour Hersh has mentioned in The Guardian recently.