Anyone know anything about the reinforced concrete theory?

submitted by Jesus from self.911truth

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There are no “core columns.” The core has nothing to do with how those buildings keep themselves up. Steel buildings are built using exoskeletons propped from outside.

The buildings’ external walls collapsed. Otherwise, the collapse would have looked differently. That’s why the fire argument holds no water.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

We can agree that the fire argument holds no water.

The external walls collapsed under the pressure of the explosives that were placed and detonated in the buildings.

[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, that is what the images I saw of the "sliced" steel girders was supposed to "prove" -- that charges were placed in specific places to create a foot print demolition. I don't know how many footprint demolitions you have ever seen but they all clearly look exactly the same.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How about the video link of the Israeli "art students" who installed the explosives?

Did you happen to take a look at that video? The evidence is compelling.

[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All of the evidence is compelling. I've seen all the videos and photos a million times. Even the one of the guy masturbating to the planes flying into the Twin Towers.

The thing I miss most about the end of regretsy was all the homemade 9/11 memorial kitsch.