use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Present and discuss evidence showing that the US Government's version of the events of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Submissions or comments supporting the official version, including links to sites purporting to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement (depending on context), are considered off-topic here.
BOLLYN BOOKS:
by Christopher Bollyn
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World [PDF]
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World (Abridged)
● Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
● The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
● More on Issuu
CORBETT REPORT:
by James Corbett
● 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
● 9/11 War Games
● 9/11 Whistleblowers
DOCUMENTARIES:
● 9/11 A New Standard For Deception by Kevin Ryan
● 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad
● 9/11: Intercepted
● 9/11 Ripple Effect
● Christopher Bollyn: Making Sense of the War on Terror by Ed Mays
● Loose Change (2nd Edition)
● The 9/11 Masterpiece Christopher Bollyn
● The New American Century
● The New Pearl Harbor Full 9/11 Documentary
● War Is Always By Deception
● Zero An Investigation Into 9-11
RESOURCES:
AE911Truth/UAF WTC7 Study Data:
● AE911Truth.org/wtc7
● ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
The 911Dataset Project:
● Archive.org : 911DataSets.org
● WebCitation.org : 911DataSets.org
Other:
● Truther Top 20 Counter Points To The Official 9/11 Story
Ask to co-mod or earn an invite.
CSS and banner images by /u/JasonCarswell
Anyone know anything about the reinforced concrete theory?
submitted 4 years ago by Jesus from self.911truth
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (3 children)
I think 100% steel
https://cdn.historydaily.org/content/52789/412056c116e0a260c4099227f5a88c45.jpg
https://cdn.historydaily.org/content/52789/ed05520a5d4a1f3a2ea2953808c500a6.jpg
[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
Typically, in construction, one would wrap steel in concrete. But the concrete isn’t for vertical structural integrity. Just because concrete is used in construction doesn’t mean the buildings weren’t nearly identical to every other steel building ever constructed that never collapsed. It’s in the reports.
This is very basic level logic and honestly a bizarre question.
[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
concrete is great in compression. Vertical structural integrity is concrete's forte.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
This is correct.
Concrete performs poorly under tension. Steel reinforcement is added to improve it's tensile performance.
This can be a problem for structural longevity. The water which is trapped in concrete will eventually rust the steel. Steel expands when it rusts, and applies tensile forces to the concrete, and damages it from within.
So, I doubt that the support columns were encased in steel. The architects/engineers would easily identify this failure mode, and Unless it was intentionally designed in (which is unlikely).
The concrete foundation is almost certainly reinforced concrete, as it should only see compression force.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)