use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
Present and discuss evidence showing that the US Government's version of the events of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Submissions or comments supporting the official version, including links to sites purporting to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement (depending on context), are considered off-topic here.
BOLLYN BOOKS:
by Christopher Bollyn
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World [PDF]
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World (Abridged)
● Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
● The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
● More on Issuu
CORBETT REPORT:
by James Corbett
● 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
● 9/11 War Games
● 9/11 Whistleblowers
DOCUMENTARIES:
● 9/11 A New Standard For Deception by Kevin Ryan
● 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad
● 9/11: Intercepted
● 9/11 Ripple Effect
● Christopher Bollyn: Making Sense of the War on Terror by Ed Mays
● Loose Change (2nd Edition)
● The 9/11 Masterpiece Christopher Bollyn
● The New American Century
● The New Pearl Harbor Full 9/11 Documentary
● War Is Always By Deception
● Zero An Investigation Into 9-11
RESOURCES:
AE911Truth/UAF WTC7 Study Data:
● AE911Truth.org/wtc7
● ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
The 911Dataset Project:
● Archive.org : 911DataSets.org
● WebCitation.org : 911DataSets.org
Other:
● Truther Top 20 Counter Points To The Official 9/11 Story
Ask to co-mod or earn an invite.
CSS and banner images by /u/JasonCarswell
New WTC7 Controlled-Demolition Analysis Scientifically Proves 9/11 Terror Attacks Were a US Govt-sponsored, False Flag Operation and Inside Job
submitted 4 years ago by useless_aether from stateofthenation2012.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 4 years ago* (1 child)
I, too, love turning a tragedy into entertainment.
But the headline is wrong; the analysis is not new, in fact it predates the events of 9-11, which is why it was incorrect.
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
the analysis is not new, in fact it predates the events of 9-11, which is why it was incorrect.
Do you have any evidence to back up this statement?
view the rest of the comments →
[–]HopeThatHalps 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (1 child)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)