you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Not buying it. And WTC7 fell because it was a warm day, right?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Let's say Ryan is correct. Wouldn't all the architecture codes and laws have to be updated to have better fool-proof designs against problems with anti-fire measures, ventilation, fireproof building materials, not to mention structural integrity should internal fires happen without sprinklers?

Why was the WTC architect whacked soon after denying it could have possibly fallen like that?

There's waaaaaaaay too many loose ends or rumours that he never goes over, just angrily saying we're all idiots for not buying this part of the official story.

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not to mention that exactly zero steel-framed buildings have ever collapsed into their footprints, except on that one day in New York. Have you ever looked at the site Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth? Now it is expanded to include pilots, etc. They don't believe the steel beams melted and have been calling for an independent investigation for many years. My a-ha moment came in 2002 or 2003 when I stumbled on a website for architects with an article that started with words to the effect: we all know the official story cannot possibly be true.

I didn't know about the architect being whacked but do know that the buildings were designed to sustain being hit by two 747s, the biggest plane made at the time of the design. Even Trump said just a few days ago that explosives must have been used.

There are so many other points that could be made. He got a lot of views but the video just doesn't make sense.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Didn't the Plasco building in the Tehran fire collapse into its own footprint? https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=_MgJTa7SDaY

[–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the second vid you can see a "crimp" at the top of the building just before it starts to fall. According to Architects & Engineers, that is the tell-tale sign of destruction by explosives (controlled demolition). Perhaps the same group was involved in 911 and this explosion. Who had opportunity and motive?