Muh Jet Fuel ~ Ryan Dawson

submitted by JasonCarswell from (youtube.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm still not buying it. Architects would account for that. Further, the numbers are not good according to this list: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/melting-temperature-metals-d_860.html

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not buying it. And WTC7 fell because it was a warm day, right?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Let's say Ryan is correct. Wouldn't all the architecture codes and laws have to be updated to have better fool-proof designs against problems with anti-fire measures, ventilation, fireproof building materials, not to mention structural integrity should internal fires happen without sprinklers?

Why was the WTC architect whacked soon after denying it could have possibly fallen like that?

There's waaaaaaaay too many loose ends or rumours that he never goes over, just angrily saying we're all idiots for not buying this part of the official story.

[–]CompleteDoubterII 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The circumstances of 9/11 were pretty extraordinary. It seems like updating the codes in order to account for being hit by a plane would be rather odd.

Look, I'm kind of new to the 9/11 truth movement; there's definitely some nonsense with the official story (the declassified Dancing Israelis were my red pill), but I've been looking at both sides and it seems to be debunked. I'll throw you here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/forumindex.php, https://www.metabunk.org/, https://www.911myths.com. I think you know where to get the truther side of the story.