Limited Hangout: "Julian Assange - 9/11 Investigation question" posted by Stian Arnesen (2017-12-05)

submitted by JasonCarswell from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

LOL, this fraud is so obvious. Just like gatekeeper Chomsky he has the audacity to say 9/11 is NOT important.

His body language tells it all. He shat his pants then managed to stutter out the possibility of Saudi involvement then seemed to develop a slight paralysis of his throat and stammered and yammered about possible other states but could not bring himself to say more on the issue only to say it was 'no longer so important' as there were more recent events requiring our attention. The elephant in the room could have shat on his head but he would pretend not to notice it, but maybe blink a lot...You could almost see the little red Mossad sniper laser scope triangle, on his forehead that he was obviously imagining.... Or he is mossad.

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

man i wanted to comment how both chomsky and assange talk in this sly, beat-around-the-bush, word-mincing way when confronted with a 'difficult' question.

there is no flow and rhythm in the way they talk, rather they fracture it into pieces and convolute it, in order to say as little as possible, as ambiguously as possible

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And then you have Chomsky fan boys who will shun you for questioning his double standards or refusal to acknowledge the importance of 9/11. He smucks his lips at Israel and Zionism, yet his activism is based on the construct of the 9/11 myth that is the offical story. To expose that foundation means no book deals, no outlets to speak his mind, nothing. So, instead, he makes money off of the tradegy and lies in the process when need be. Like all gatekeepers, the foundation of the myth can NEVER be exposed. For that reason his actions are unpardonable.

You see this charade with all limitied hangout leftists that are occasionally paraded on corporate news. Tulsi Gabbard, Max Blumenthal, Tarpley, Brand, and the controlled opposition righties like Jones, Cernovich, Peterson, and the more inspired faux-intellectuals are in their positions to spark doubt in a persons mind. The lot of them toe the line, never to cross it. If Alex Jones can prance on BBC and CNN, than he is a fake. If Gabbard is able to have free airtime and talk about how the US funds ISIS on CNN, AFTER THE FACT, then we can all but conclude she is a controlled opposition, that and her ties with the Council on Foreign Relations (hosting some events).

Where faux-leftists fail miserably is their dismissal of a bi-partisan effort to cover-up, ignore, disuade and disregard any mention of Zionist, Neoconservative, Israeli, CIA, and ABOVE ALL CFR/ David Rockefeller's involvement in the events of 9/11.