WTC7: "Dangerous fuel generator pumped diesel fuel throughout the building, against fire-code and insurance company request", "Directly lead to aggravation of fire damage and collapse of the building"

submitted by Vigte from self.911truth

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

A couple of problems with a liquid fuel theory:

  • The fires were small and located in one central location on the building, and the building collapse started at the base.
  • The rubble wasn't aggressively burning with excess fuel after the collapse.
  • There was a lack of black smoke that is produced from fuel fires.
  • Excess fuel didn't flow out of the building and continue to burn.
  • A count down was overheard that preceded the collapse.
  • Collapses caused by fire are asymmetric.

The proposed theory is implausible. (This isn't a criticism of you Vigte.)

Edit:. Does anyone think that this looks like a burning building that collapsed as a result of a fuel fire?

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I agree, there was no "explosion" involving fire in WTC7, so this theory doesn't make sense. Kind of disappointed it's getting so many upvotes when it so obviously is wrong

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I doubt most actually processed the title. Also, Vigte's generally have substance, so they probably didn't scrutinize the title.

I also noticed that in recent videos the is more smoke from the twin towers than I recalled. Do you have any archived that you could compare the ones in the link?
I suppose the towers did smolder for 3 months, but I recall the smoke looking a bit different. I'll look into it, as well.

Tomorrow is the inverse 1/11/19.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I do remember the twin towers smoking a ton, I don't think that's changed. I do have an original VHS tape I recorded of 9/11 from the news the day it happened though, I might have to break that out some day lol

I think you're right about the title, people just saw Vigte and WTC7 and upvoted

[–]Vigte[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

We will just have to wait and see. Overlord said the files wouldn't make sense until the end.

For now all we have is scattered pieces of an investigation.

The documents say that is what the insurance company blamed WTC7 on. Could be their version of "find an excuse" - but the anhydrous coolant system was known before docu-drops, the insurance company's findings seem to back up the 9/11 truth "guess" regarding the coolant being a major factor. Could be the system itself was used as a bomb, seems more than likely.

Never did I said "I believe it was fire and fire alone" - I was merely copying the wording of the documents.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eh I think that Overlord stuff is a limited hangout by the CIA potentially. It's theater. I don't think we're going to learn anything new from some papers getting released (that could've been massively edited in the last 18 years).

I think what we know now is about as good as it's going to get, unfortunately. But it's interesting to dig in to, I guess. There's just so much active disinfo about it