use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Present and discuss evidence showing that the US Government's version of the events of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Submissions or comments supporting the official version, including links to sites purporting to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement (depending on context), are considered off-topic here.
BOLLYN BOOKS:
by Christopher Bollyn
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World [PDF]
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World (Abridged)
● Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
● The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
● More on Issuu
CORBETT REPORT:
by James Corbett
● 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
● 9/11 War Games
● 9/11 Whistleblowers
DOCUMENTARIES:
● 9/11 A New Standard For Deception by Kevin Ryan
● 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad
● 9/11: Intercepted
● 9/11 Ripple Effect
● Christopher Bollyn: Making Sense of the War on Terror by Ed Mays
● Loose Change (2nd Edition)
● The 9/11 Masterpiece Christopher Bollyn
● The New American Century
● The New Pearl Harbor Full 9/11 Documentary
● War Is Always By Deception
● Zero An Investigation Into 9-11
RESOURCES:
AE911Truth/UAF WTC7 Study Data:
● AE911Truth.org/wtc7
● ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
The 911Dataset Project:
● Archive.org : 911DataSets.org
● WebCitation.org : 911DataSets.org
Other:
● Truther Top 20 Counter Points To The Official 9/11 Story
Ask to co-mod or earn an invite.
CSS and banner images by /u/JasonCarswell
Degrees of 911 truth
submitted 5 years ago by TheJamesRocket from imgur.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–]PecosinRat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
Seems to be missing all the physical evidence of the towers collapsing, or am I just missing something...?
[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
The problem is that debunkers have specifically tailored their strategys to 'disprove' and 'refute' the WTC demolition theorys. Its a topic they are well prepared to argue about. They have lots of delaying tactics that can bog down an inexperienced truther, and discredit him in front of an audience.
I have no doubt at all that the twin towers were demolished, but the fact is, thats NOT the first issue you should bring up when trying to educate newbies (or take down skeptics). Demolition theorys are the path of most resistance. Thats not to say you can't win a debate against a debunker on that topic.
You CAN win, but only if you are very knowledgeable and are prepared to spend some time and effort working through their arguments. It'll be a long and boring discussion, and many people will have tuned out by the end. (Thus its a pyhric victory for a truther)
[–]PecosinRat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
Interesting, James. I've always felt that any arguments beyond the "asymmetrical damage versus symmetrical collapse" were unnecessary. However, I do understand what you're getting at.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]PecosinRat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]TheJamesRocket[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]PecosinRat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)