you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PecosinRat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This article suggests that nuclear devices were the cause of the collapses of the towers on 9/11 and that there were no planes involved. This particular approach is a detriment to the efforts to bring about 9/11 truth, if for no other reason than 99% of the people will dismiss it out of hand. We must get to the point of broad public consensus that the official explanation is not just wrong, but criminally wrong, before the "how it happened" question can be asked and effectively answered. Until then the best strategy is bringing undeniable facts back to the public conversation rather than engage in speculations that--to many of the public--are a perfect demonstration of our dismiss-able nuttiness.

[–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Disagree. There is plenty of evidence for nukes, and facts are facts. Since the de jure authorities are still avoiding all truths, it's up to volunteers to find whatever they can to fill up the info-vacuum. They found enough to fill in many blanks in favor of the alternative narrative.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Israelis would not of had to steal nuclear triggers in the US with front companies, whether Shapiro at NUMEC or Milchan and his henchmen spies, and risk their lives, or Vanunu, having exposed Dimona being jailed for nearly lifenin Isreal, if nukes were fake.