use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Present and discuss evidence showing that the US Government's version of the events of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Submissions or comments supporting the official version, including links to sites purporting to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement (depending on context), are considered off-topic here.
BOLLYN BOOKS:
by Christopher Bollyn
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World [PDF]
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World (Abridged)
● Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
● The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
● More on Issuu
CORBETT REPORT:
by James Corbett
● 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
● 9/11 War Games
● 9/11 Whistleblowers
DOCUMENTARIES:
● 9/11 A New Standard For Deception by Kevin Ryan
● 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad
● 9/11: Intercepted
● 9/11 Ripple Effect
● Christopher Bollyn: Making Sense of the War on Terror by Ed Mays
● Loose Change (2nd Edition)
● The 9/11 Masterpiece Christopher Bollyn
● The New American Century
● The New Pearl Harbor Full 9/11 Documentary
● War Is Always By Deception
● Zero An Investigation Into 9-11
RESOURCES:
AE911Truth/UAF WTC7 Study Data:
● AE911Truth.org/wtc7
● ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
The 911Dataset Project:
● Archive.org : 911DataSets.org
● WebCitation.org : 911DataSets.org
Other:
● Truther Top 20 Counter Points To The Official 9/11 Story
Ask to co-mod or earn an invite.
CSS and banner images by /u/JasonCarswell
CGI planes WTC in 2 mins
submitted 4 years ago by Tom_Bombadil from 153news.net
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (1 child)
You're promoting no nukes and now CGI planes? lol man.... you're eating up the disinfo stories lately huh. Too bad. These are TAVISTOCK disinformation narratives that distract from reality and discredit real discussions about these topics.
[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago* (0 children)
Diplomudge? That hurts my feelings... :-p
I don't see evidence for actual terrorists.
Also, it's extremely difficult for large jets to maneuver with accuracy at 500 mph through the air a couple of hundred of feet above sea level, because if the increased air density. It's full throttle.
Plus there no good reason to go that fast even if they're remote piloted, because they "flew" in at a slight curve and it's easy to miss at 500mph speed. Keep in mind that any time the wings aren't flat that the plane is somewhat dropping in elevation.
They did hit the bullseye. The bullseye. TWICE Exactly on the floors with the servers (to many details to go into), etc. WTC 1 was 1,368 feet tall. So 1,368 feet / 110 floors = 12.4 ft per floor. IIRC they had 3 floors to hit, so they had to center corrcectly with an angled wing. Centering perfectly for impact on 1 floor with an angled aircraft is a tiny target if you're flying at 500 mph. Given this reality, I don't see that they really would have had a choice but to fake it. Too much was at stake.
Would they risk hitting the wrong location(s)? No. You tell me... ?
Also, the "how" doesn't matter as much as the "who" and "why".
It the public sees this more often and started asking questions, then there are so many additional facts that are suspicious beyond reason (WTC 7, etc.) that there's no turning back.
The objection I always had was the use of the word "hologram". CGI is not a hologram. That was probably part of the real disinfo.
I'll circle around and update this response in an hour or so, because IMO there are additional factors that are important to consider.
Crucially the "who" and "why" are the most important questions, which aren't included here.
Who: American and Israeli Zionists (Christian and Jewish, both).
Christopher Bollyn: Solving 9-11, The Deception That Changed The World
Why:
Edit: a bit of this and that
view the rest of the comments →
[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)