Primitivism, population decline or minimalism is suicidal and is wholly impractical by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]JuliusCaesar225 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Ideally we become masters over technology rather than slaves. Technological progress currently has control of us rather than the reverse. Think of technology like drugs. Some are okay in moderation, some can be tolerated everyday(caffeine), others need to be completely rejected. Right now the only technology we consider "bad" is weapons but destructive potential of technology is far more than just weapons.

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]Three_oneFour 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, wouldn't many trans people supposedly be 100% comfortable as the opposite gender? And since we know absolutely that a trans person is 100% the gender they identify as, then it must be the case that they are completely comfortable with the gender they "are" because they are supposedly the gender they identify as.

Oh wait, you can't make such pathetic definitions for shit and expect any logical application to work properly

Would you support secession in response to a Biden victory by x0x7 in AskSaidIt

[–]d3rr 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes and our "bro" Drumpf was right up in the mix with them, banning bump stocks and regulating trade like a goddamn democrat. Both sides was my point. The deep state was my point.

Song-Writer Contest Challenge #1 For The SaidIt.net And Windsor, Ontario Communities by JasonCarswell in Windsor_Ontario

[–]d3rr 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reddit is just kind of a sex toy, but Swartz also planted the seeds of Sci-Hub. For that he may be remembered for all of history: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub

Sequential vs Interspersal speech by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it's a joke.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Three_oneFour 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no solution to this. By saying that a man who has sex with a transwoman is gay is factually correct, but goes against gender ideology that says he is straight. The statement also would call the transwoman a woman for the main part of the sentence but then a man when talking about his sleeping habits. That's like saying, "So when the innocent defendant commited the crime, he was without blame and fully culpable"

The problem isn't Stonewall using gender ideology here, it's that they used inconsistent logic.

"With regard to excellence, it is not enough to know, but we must try to have and use it." -Aristotle. by HibikiBlack in conspiracy

[–]ArcturianDeathTrap 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"I need quotes to live My Life."

Bayer/Monsanto's Glyphosate was found in 14 of the most popular beers in Germany by the Environmental Institute, Munich. by HibikiBlack in conspiracy

[–]ArcturianDeathTrap 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pesticide is sometimes used as a general term. Have you not heard of Insecticide?

Odysee now has playlists by Drewski in technology

[–]ArcturianDeathTrap 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So if bitchute's just as gay as youtube, what's currently the least-gay vid host?

https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=60ca9f30efde6

Odysee now has playlists by Drewski in technology

[–]ArcturianDeathTrap 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

http lbry com team

Jimmy Dore speaks out against the adverse side effects of the vaccine by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]send_nasty_stuff [score hidden]  (0 children)

India is an enormous country with a huge population. Many of the rural areas in India are totally disconnected from the cities and bureaucrats don't have a good handle on demographic data. Saying 'cremations are going up' means nothing coming from a country that can't even get indoor plumbing installed. Even if cremations are going up it's on you to connect that directly to covid which you have not done. This is another example of you spitting out a mainstream newstory without drilling down and making logical arguments. You're also distracting from the multiple issues I presented in my first post.

I can debate you but you have to ask yourself, whose side are you really on?

This is rhetoric. The 2 party system in the United States is a Jew created distraction from the reality of what's going on in the world. Every comment you make comes from a place where you revert back to the Jew simulacrum. You never address this or argue against it. You just go back to talking points.

It's like me trying to prove to you 1 + 1 = 2

Lazy cliched rhetoric.

It's not a conspiracy that a vaccinated population is the only way to overcome this pandemic

Lol. This is one of the most braindead statement I've seen you make. First you again assume we are in a pandemic (we are not; stop using the jew marketing technique of repeating the lie and hoping it sets in the targets brain; that won't work here). Second you assume only vaccines can end pandemics. That's just historically and scientifically wrong. I don't understand how any good faith educated person could make such a dumb statement.

Another country right now, Brazil, is also in the same boat with a Conservative politician doing the absolute bare minimum

Again you are trying to steer the conversation to talking points about 'conservatives bad'. We aren't conservatives here. We demonstrate and say this to you almost daily. What does Bolsonoro have to do with the points I brought up two comments up the chain? Your behavior here is highly suspicious.

If the idea of creating vaccines was to kill us all, then it's very very very very very inefficient.

The dissident right does not know exactly why the vaccine was created. We can only make inferences based on how the anti white ruling elites have acted in the past and present. We can look at safety data coming out. We can look at the rushed process. We can look at strange changes to vaccine liability laws. We can look at excessive think tank 'practice' with a pandemic. We can look at the track records of the people promoting the virus (gates in africa?). We can look at the creater of MRNA technology who said he was concerned about suppression of hydroxycholoriquine and ivermectin effectiveness recently on Bret Weinstein's podcast. We can look at other blunders by big pharma in the past. We can look at how irresponsible health officials have been. We can look at the lies with the HIV/AIDs 'pandemic'. We can look at Fauchi's recent emails. And the list goes on of the evidence we can gather that shows us there is something very wrong and very dangerous with this vaccine.

If they die then well, there goes the world economy with it. So the payoff still doesn't make sense.

You assume elites are in it for 'capital' and economic benefit. No. They are in it for control. They are in it for long term mastery of the planet and all it's resources and by resources they mean non jews as resources as well. Non jews are not considered human. They are cattle to Jews. They seek to bring the world population to under 500 million in balance with 'nature'. The do not want to govern or lead the planet they want to be Gods who are above the masses of lower beings.

The Six Million Dollar Nebularomantic DemiMan by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Socialjustus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So she's just a normal girl on the autistic spectrum.

I hate how these predators target autistic people.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]GatitoMalo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Public health as a discipline has been struggling with this for ages. Identities and behavior just not matching.

"I only spend maybe one, two hours tops out of my week pursuing sex with men. The rest of the week, I have a wife, kids, a white picket fence, I'm a respectable member of my church. I have a dog and a good job. I'm not a homosexual." (This paraphrased anecdote collected prior to bisexuality as a salient identity.)

For public health, identity, desire, sociopolitics be damned, it's about the sort of sex you have with the different sexes. MSM: Men who have sex with men is a term they've been using for ages. It's gotten a bit long, recently I read a paper where the cohort was BMSMW. I.e. behaviorally bisexual black men. They manage to have lots of same-sex sex but maintain a heterosexual identity. It's pretty fascinating.

Of course, trans came along and upended the entire table. TWAW and all that. It might be "heterosexual sex" to some GAMP muppet, but as far as STI's are concerned? Very gay.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]radicalcentrist [score hidden]  (0 children)

Gay people can hide their sexuality. No one has to know you're gay unless you publicly out yourself as one.

That's my stance I've also supported, and I've never been in favor of chasing someone down for not harming anyone.

The Gay Pride Parades and Pride Months are over the top nonsense. Homosexuality can never create children, so celebrating it doesn't really feel liberating. If you're a gay person, just be glad you live in the tolerant West and not the Middle East where they stone you for this stuff...

If anything, we need a Western Civilization Pride Month. Since it's literally the only Civilization that gives them rights.

I have no issue with the Same-Sex marriage. If they want to larp as husband and wife, more power to them. They'll probably end up divorced anyway.

Cable car accident in Italy; 14 dead, only a 5-year-old survived. by Aufer in WatchPeopleDie

[–]RedditSuxDixx 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yo insta me I mountain bike to man but in NZ, StephenD.MTB, and trust me I think every cable car place around the world will be double tripple checking all brakes and all systems after this

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]firemonke8 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stonewall's homophobia is showing. How long till most of the "gays" are actually heterosexual?? I think its good that the support for Stonewall is getting institutionally reduced, woke homophobia doesn't need institutional support

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]firemonke8 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

absolute clown world

How bureaucracy works by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you know how to perform the Hinnielick maneuver?

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Chunkeeguy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When are those crusading white knight ladykillers Ben Cohen, David Paisley, Benjamin Butterworth and Owen Jones going to come to Stonewall's defence?

Sequential vs Interspersal speech by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]Cornfed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Or is this a joke? If it is, you can understand how I initially fell for it in this insane modern society.

Motorcyclist Tries to Overtake Bus, Hits Head on Stopped Truck, Falls and Gets Crushed by Bus by Oneda in WatchPeopleDie

[–]zoristtot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's working fine.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]sneeuweekhoorn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Do they mean trans women? Because that's the only kind of "woman" gay men could sleep with and still be gay.

Odysee now has playlists by Drewski in technology

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's owned by two Zionist Jews, so future censorship if you anti-Zionsit will coem soon enough.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Chunkeeguy[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's Stonewall so I doubt that. Gay men who don't want to fuck women are transphobic according to them.

Biden Openly Colludes with Russia by mongre in politics

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Joe is just like long time democrat Trump, a Chabadnik ZIonist.

Woke leftist is terrified of Glenn Greenwald and Matt Taibbi. "This view, that there should be a unified left-right “populist” movement against the Establishment" and "having people stop hating each other and hate the ruling class instead". They want us divided and fighting each other. by Chipit in politics

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Chris Rulon and 911inreverse blog, just to note, has exposed that Greenwald is a controlled opposition Homo Jew and is a progressive Zionist and Taibbi is justt like his father a liar who thinks 9/11 truth is racist and was destroyed by David Ray Griffin when he dared to debate about it. They are not my allies when they reject Christ and push limited hangouts.

AzuraCast installs everything you need to get a web radio station up and running in minutes by panzerF in technology

[–]rabbiibbar 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if i wanted to have a podcast/radio station, i would register a domain name and allow visitors to my website to play an mp3 audio or mp4 video file.

this would give me more direct control over the logistics of my system.

if i were to invest a ton of time and money into a azuracast or youtube or other platform and that platform either cancels me or goes belly up, i am dead in the water.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]MidwestDude 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably means women who sleep with men who are on the DL?

Jimmy Dore speaks out against the adverse side effects of the vaccine by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]radicalcentrist [score hidden]  (0 children)

Unless you can convince me otherwise that you are here in good faith and not misrepresenting yourself.

I already have evidence this virus is not fake. India as a country demonstrated just how dangerous it was to let people gather together before most people got vaccines.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/india/india-covid-deaths-crematoriums-intl-hnk-dst/index.html

"Before the pandemic, we used to cremate eight to 10 people (daily)," said Jitender Singh Shunty, head of the Seemapuri crematorium in eastern New Delhi. "Now, we are cremating 100 to 120 a day." Demand is so high that Seemapuri crematorium has expanded into its parking lot, where dozens of workers construct new cremation platforms from bricks and mortar. There is so little space and so many bodies that families have to get a ticket and wait in line for their turn.

And the sad thing is, they were actually doing pretty well with handling the virus since they did take it serious from the start. But surprise! This is when Conservative politicians reveal how out of touch they are when it comes to science. President Modi basically stood by and tried to blame other people when Indians were suddenly dying in large numbers.

And all for what? What was the point? Nobody gains from watching dead bodies being burned 24/7.

I can debate you but you have to ask yourself, whose side are you really on? It's like me trying to prove to you 1 + 1 = 2. It's not a conspiracy that a vaccinated population is the only way to overcome this pandemic. Another country right now, Brazil, is also in the same boat with a Conservative politician doing the absolute bare minimum as his country gets devastated by this virus. All denial does at this point is slowly suffocate a population that is already caught working paycheck to paycheck under dangerous conditions.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/brazil-s-bolsonaro-warns-virus-vaccine-can-turn-people-into-crocodiles-1.5237678

Bolsonaro makes the idiotic claim that a vaccine will turn you into a crocodile. Meanwhile, his same country is now recording up to 3,000 people dead EVERY DAY.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/brazil-reports-2997-covid-19-deaths-24-hours-health-ministry-2021-06-16/

If the idea of creating vaccines was to kill us all, then it's very very very very very inefficient. Canada, USA, UK, Israel, UAE have all gotten their jabs and they're all ready to re-open safely with the number of hospitalizations going down every single day.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1194939/rate-covid-vaccination-by-county-worldwide/

https://globalnews.ca/news/7935405/coronavirus-canada-june-9-2021/

https://globalnews.ca/news/7950896/israel-covid-restrictions-masks-indoors/

If they die then well, there goes the world economy with it. So the payoff still doesn't make sense.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The full thread: https://twitter.com/stonewalluk/status/1405199103496175619

Twitter isn't pleased.

The Antiwar Comic: The Misinformation War by TonyDiGerolamo in Comics

[–]TonyDiGerolamo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, so you didn't even read it.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]DeepCrimsonPill [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the dissident right needs to take the L on this one. Not saying it leads to the healthiest of lifestyles, but so far I've seen little evidence that homosexuality is acquired or associated with pedophilia. If we can't back up any of our claims with real statistics, our arguments will lose over time. I think the best thing we can do is give them an olive branch as long as they realize their place in the hierarchy. Pagan society wasn't fire and brimstone over it, so I think it would be unhealthy if we tried to force it back.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Chunkeeguy[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Straight is the new gay

BOTH: Recently the following claim was made: "Being cis and straight is a trauma response". Do you agree with this claim? by ISaidWhatISaid in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlanJam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"academic twitter" well there's the problem. A lot of QT seem to be enthralled by highly abstract and esoteric philosophy and gender studies. Problem is they take these things uncritically and end up parroting a bunch of weird ideas with no coherency. Not to mention its kinda pretentious.

The Flaming Lips - Will You Return / When You Come Down by d3rr in music

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2833768/

Theory of Obscurity: A Film About The Residents

Jimmy Dore speaks out against the adverse side effects of the vaccine by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]send_nasty_stuff [score hidden]  (0 children)

You haven't addressed any of the issues I've brought up. You don't seem to be here with the intention to debate. You constantly ignore points and spit out canned responses. You never change your position yet your are here almost daily spitting out 'approved' narratives. Why are you on this sub if you consistently oppose everything we say and never really address our counter arguments? How is that something that you choose to spend so much time on?

I'm going to go ahead and give you a rule three warning. Unless you can convince me otherwise that you are here in good faith and not misrepresenting yourself.

The women who have sex with gay men will now be safe - but not from Stonewall by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]hufflepuff-poet 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women who have sex with gay men=?!?!?!🤔🤡😭🤯

Both: How do you feel about Title IX being changed to protect gender identity instead of biological sex? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]FlanJam 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. I didn't even realize dorms and showers were opened to self-id. Really hope there hasn't been any incidents.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]send_nasty_stuff [score hidden]  (0 children)

Most people I chat with online that support the LGBT community don't do it because the woke academic institutions say that it's safe and healthy to be LBGT. They support the LGBT community because there's a framing in the Jewish run media that LGBT people are an innocent persecuted group of individuals historically and presently. There are lot more layers of complexity to this issues though. The Jewish people have a long running religious belief that that 'God' has both male and female traits. This drives their desire to protect and promote LGBT. Another big reason the Jewish community funds and fervently supports LGBT is because they oppose traditional 'cis gender' societies for a host of reasons. Creating a large homosexual population in a host nation reduces birth rates and causes a support for Jewish causes. It's a way to create a 'golem' for Jews.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]Girondin [score hidden]  (0 children)

Read the history of this stuff, notice how many of them are sexually deviant / non-normative. A lot of their positions is not grounded in objective reality but on personal wish-fulfillment. most of the experts are employed in gender clinics and/or gain rewards and prestige from advocacy groups, so of course their supportive of LGBTQ acceptance.

Im not denying all of their research or theories or whatever, but their is bias just like all fields of inquiry. like people in quaranic or biblical studies think it is more important then it is, sociologist thinking social effects matter more compared to evo psychologist who think biology matter more etc.

GC: Which of the most popular social media websites is the most tolerant of GC views? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkJefferson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, YT seems open and magnanimous on the surface, but it's just that their censorship game is more advanced and subtle. It is exhausting to work around and deceptive in that it makes you think you already had your say when in fact you didn't. And you can't really access your comment/reply history like reddit and twitter so that makes it hard to check for any removals. I once replaced every letter that could be replaced with symbols and numbers(@,0,1,$,3 etc) to get a comment through. Ridiculous.

I'll never fully get into commenting real, well-thought-out passages on YT until the system changes to be less restrictive.

Genderology's End Goal: Chinese scientists get male rats to give BIRTH by conjoining them with females and transplanting a uterus in 'vile Frankenscience' study by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]sneeuweekhoorn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would not be surprised at all if some TIMs saw this as a triumph and want it to be repeated on humans.

Sequential vs Interspersal speech by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]Cornfed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This sort of thing might make sense in terms of programming, but in natural language it makes no sense at all. These clusters would limit the scope of speech and reduce the possibility of various nuances and subtleties. Basically the answer to a question no-one asked.

Do you find "people who menstruate" or "birthing people" dehumanizing? by Rage-Xion in GenderCritical

[–]MarkTwainiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have a different view. I don't think these terms are meant to detach women from the lived experiences of our female bodies. I think they are meant to anchor & limit women to a few uniquely female & short-lived functions of some of our bodies.

Referring to us as "people who menstruate" reduces us to a process that only occurs during approximately 40 years of our lives, from age 11 to 51 on average. Moreover, this terminology suggests that during those 40 years, we menstruate 24/7/365. When, in fact, most of us menstruate for at most one week out of every four.

As for calling us "birthing people," for most women labor & childbirth takes up a day or two of every FT pregnancy. I'd have no problem saying that humans are breathing people because we breathe every second of our lives. But birthing is a very specific, time-limited endeavor that can only occur once a year at most, & which the vast majority of women experience only on occasion in our lives - and which many women never experience at all.

Jimmy Dore speaks out against the adverse side effects of the vaccine by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]radicalcentrist [score hidden]  (0 children)

Edit: I'm sorry but I'm not sure what more evidence I can show you that the global pandemic is real. I was there from the beginning, and almost everyone today has cellphones, making it the most documented event in human history. The idea someone could fake a virus on a global scale and get away with it just screams impossible.

In every country, the attempt at downplaying the virus was always met with pictures of dead bodies followed by struggles to keep patients on oxygen. With vaccines, the polar opposite is happening. People have gotten not one, but TWO shots, and have been able to gather together in public spaces safely.

Me and the millions of others who got vaccinated don't want to go back to Trump's World where any infected person can walk up to your face and sneeze on you. It was ridiculous, and created a sense of fear that going to your job could literally get you killed.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]Girondin [score hidden]  (0 children)

Don't trust any old social psychology or any old social science (pre 2000s before replication bias) they all have massive flaws in them. All major social psychology experiments you've heard (Milgram, Rosenhan, etc) are all false.

Evelyn Hooker study is treated like Gospel their are so many flaws. She already had an agenda before (the UCLA school of medicine founder preformed sex change operations), n=60 (30 homo 30 hetero) eliminated any subjects who were currently in psychiatric therapy, did three diagnostic tests with no oversight and discarded the results of two of them. I think it intuitively it makes no sense, as LGBT have much higher suicide rate and is contradicted by better data and method

Stereotype threat is fake (see Russel Warne, Emil OWK and sean last) so I doubt acceptance will really help them unfortunately.

Im skeptical of most histroical claims of gayness after I read "Sex Lives of the Great Artists" by Nigel Cawthorne, I assumed those claims were true until I actually read about it, guy has written like 20 books on sexual history. Nearly all of those claims come from gay rights activist, few from neutral sources.

I personally don't trust psychiatry I agree with the writings of Peter C. Gøtzsche and Thomas Szasz overall on the this subject. I don't like the language of "mentall illness" and I don't think its legimate unless brain scans actually diagnose mental illness.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]Fonched[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well then, what do you have to prove your stance?

GC: Which of the most popular social media websites is the most tolerant of GC views? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]MarkJefferson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That sounds possible. I should probably just use a new account to comment already, but I'm stubborn about using any alts. The account I'm using I've used for years, and I only use the one.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]Fonched[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I am just looking into what reasoning and evidence they have for being pro-gay. If the medical and scientific experts shifted back to that stance, I would also look into what they have to say. Then I would compare the facts.

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]Frenologist [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not a single one of those links appears to be objective. I'll come back and discuss when someone posts objective information that is based in ACTUAL science and not the peer-reviewed, circle-jerk of modern academia. Wikis ARE NOT legitimate sources nor are shill threads from 4pol.

QT: How is the concept of a "gender identity" not sexist? by Penultimate_Penance in GCdebatesQT

[–]BiologyIsReal 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, right, I'm embarrasing myself... says the guy who confused two different papers because he can't read a simple title. Nevermind that your sources understand "gender identity" as how someone perceives themself.

Putin Asks If US Assassinated Ashli Babbitt:"450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress. They didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. Isn’t that persecution for political opinions?” by Tarrock in politics

[–]magaOven 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

watch the videos. But you won't. The best part is the dumb asses filmed themselves doing it. It's always someone else's fault right?

LGBT discussion (science, morality, history) by Fonched in debatealtright

[–]send_nasty_stuff [score hidden]  (0 children)

Science-wise, LGBT identities are upheld by many experts in the present day, with many agencies having declassified homosexuality and transgenderism as mental disorders and publishing studies to support the idea that it is naturally prevalent and doable

I'm going to start with a simple question. If a consensus of 'experts in the present day' shifted and said that the LGBT 'lifestyle' was toxic, dangerous and should be discouraged for the good of the country and public health would you change your position and oppose it? Is this really about data and science for you?

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]sneeuweekhoorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't really understand why we celebrate Pride here in the Netherlands. Gay sex has been legal since 1811. We legalized gay marriage in 2001, America didn't even fully legalized gay sex until 2003.

Pride just seems like such an Americanism and American culture coming to dominate. I just don't participate in Pride and I don't understand why anyone here does. Especially when they go full in on it acting like Stonewall was some pivotal event for their own rights. Having to hear people who were born and grew up here tell me to learn my history and thank trans women of color for my rights is so aggravating. No, fuck off, you learn your history and thank Napoleon for his legal code that legalized homosexuality.

Anti-semitic, Its a Trick, We Always Use it by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]Cornfed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is plenty of evidence of internment/labour camps. I'm not aware of any evidence of death camps other than the hilarious claims of supposed former inmates who, by their own testimony, should have been dead.

QT: How is the concept of a "gender identity" not sexist? by Penultimate_Penance in GCdebatesQT

[–]BiologyIsReal 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've already said multiple times that women and men are socialized differently, but sex is the relevant part for identity (although I must I don't share current obsession with the concept of identity). But if you want to talk about unanswered questions, here are the questions you didn't answer:

  1. What are really the differences between a boy who was subject to unnecessary medical procedures and raised as a "girl" because he losed his penis, and a boy who was subject to unnecessary medical procedures (although at different times) and raised as a "girl" because he liked the wrong toys at, for instance, age 3? Why just one of them have a "female gender identity" when they are both living a lie imposed by sexists adults who think they are better off as "girls"?

  2. How do you explain males with 5α-reductase-2 deficiency who are mistaken as girls at birth and who adopt a male identity after puberty?

  3. How thinking that anyone raised as a girl (whether or not they are female) has a female "gender identity" regardless of outcome because they were raised that way is not circular logic?

Mega Drought Threatens to Shut Down Entire Western Regions by hennaojichan in conspiracy

[–]hennaojichan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This site does not usually indulge in over-the-top scare stories.

I wonder if her "son" started testosterone a year ago too? by scrantonstranglr in GenderCritical

[–]linda_senora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good point!

I think she has an older brother, she might be trying to outdo him in the masculinity department.

I wonder if her "son" started testosterone a year ago too? by scrantonstranglr in GenderCritical

[–]linda_senora 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Some of the people with whom she has interacted online might have told her where to get testosterone.

Both: How do you feel about Title IX being changed to protect gender identity instead of biological sex? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]loveSloane 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

can you imagine how triggering it would be for the poor stunning trans ladies?

How dare you call them “stunning” but leave out “brave”! Transphobe…

Whitey gets a new holiday. Happy Juneteenth yall. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]YJaewedwqewq [score hidden]  (0 children)

LMAO, one of the replies is a spam comment about getting rid of the filibuster. A funny quote from said comment: "The Framers were against 'enabling a pertinacious minority that would control the opinion of a majority.'" This is hilarious because while certainly not intended, this commenter pointed out the power Blacks and other minorities have over Whites in America. Whites built and remain (at least for now) the majority in America, yet the entire structure panders to these minorities and gives them everything but the power of life and death over Whitey (and even that is debatable, considering the favorability nonwhites who murder Whites are given)

Women hate women by Lowkey2017 in CringeAnarchy

[–]dramasexual 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can't have a successful feminist movement without at least a bare minimum of bad shitposting tbh

Jimmy Dore speaks out against the adverse side effects of the vaccine by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]send_nasty_stuff [score hidden]  (0 children)

We already had a year of just letting people catch the virus and with no real safeguard against it, and the result was at least 600,000 dead in the U.S

Your comment is full of bullshit framing techniques.

We already had a year of just letting people catch the virus

We didn't just 'let' people catch the virus. We don't have a choice if people catch viruses or not. People have been catching viruses for a millennia. 2021 is no different. Viruses are part of the human condition. Every year we have a flu season and people die from the flu. "Covid-19" is an attempt to hijack the flu season (which is a collection of different cold and flue viruses) into a 'pandemic'. The real goal is to get people to take an experimental vaccine, to fuck the economy up to get Trump out, and to get people to give up rights. The virus has the added benefit of getting the US government into even more systemically risky debt. The entire pandemic is really about 'marking' all human beings.

and the result was at least 600,000 dead in the U.S

No. Wrong. Wrong on so many levels.

First, we can't actually test for covid 19. The health commissars are using a 'PCR test' invented by the late Karey Mullis who specifically said it should not be used in the way it's currently being used. The amount of cycles you run the sample through up the chance of false positive (and we know they've been changing these cycle to politically benefit themselves). The 600k figure is a politically manipulated figure. There's a financial conflict of interest because hospitals are paid more if they put covid 19 on the death certificate. Even the rules on when and how you attribute a death to covid 19 were manipulated to boost numbers. So that number is most likely around 60-80k (which is coincidentally about the number of people that die every year from flu complications. Actual flu deaths are down a whopping 90%. Hmmmm....

Now vaccines are out with millions of people already receiving their second doses, and the results have been fewer deaths in general

According to the Vaccine adverse events reporting system this isn't true. Deaths and side effects from the vaccine are going up every day. It's also very difficult to report to this system and you can be federal charge if you don't do the paper work for reporting correctly. Sick people are being dissuaded not to report. Yet the numbers are going up. There was even a Harvard study showing fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS.

and most Covid cases going back to pre-2020 levels.

This doesn't even make sense. What are 'pre 2020' covid levels? Are you typing from a script centrist?

If there's suppose to be some mass extinction event, then we're already past the point of no return

Lol. Ok. So we should just stop sounding the alarm about the vaccine because everyone is going to die anyway? My understanding is that only half the country is vaccinated give or take. There are still millions of whites we can save if we get the word out about the danger of the vaccine. Even if there is not 'depopulation' there are still a lot of other problems with this vaccine. Rushed through the process. You can't sue big pharma for adverse effects. There could be long term effects (prions, sterilization, brain disorders, etc). There absolutely is privacy concerns and 'tracking' concerns. Do you realize how easy it can be to take human rights away when you have the entire population of a country on a 'vaccine passport' system? Do you realize how easy it can be to slip in a deadly vaccine or a sterilzation vaccine in the 5th or 6th or 7th shot? Once vaccines are compulsory you could literally infect the entire population in one round. You don't see a problem with that?

Finally let's assume the people making the vaccine have no ill will. There's no goal to track people and use the data for nefarious grid control purposes. There's no accidental problems with any of the rushed gene therapy bullshit. Even if everything is legit you have a very real destruction of individual liberties. The right to refuse medical treatment is a human right. Nobody should be forced to get a needle in their arm at the threat of jail, starvation or legal/social harassment.

If someone still refuses their free medicine

There's not such thing as a free donut.

then good luck I guess.

You have the right to your opinion but I don't think you'll like the result of a state apparatus so powerful that they can legally hold you down and stick a needle in your arm. That's a LOT of power. I don't trust ANY government with that power and especially not the current anti human satanic cabal running the international show.

QT: If all these "third genders" around the world, throughout history, in all these different cultures are transgender, then where are all the gay people? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]Heimdekledi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No I’d apply it to all of the above

Rapey t**f scum by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]TransspeciesUnicorn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they don't understand what "rape" means.

FallingDown (1993) Michael Douglas, Barbara Hershey, by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]Cornfed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are different interpretations of this. One is that the main character is a hero fighting back against a sick society and this is good. The other is that the bad guys are rubbing in the fact that a society to our liking is being phased out and there is nothing we can do about it, as symbolised by the Robert Duval character being about to retire and be replaced by his latino female partner.

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]PatsyStone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The minute I criticized Gender Joe Biden, she snapped and said (I'm paraphrasing) "This office is free of politics"

A lot of what is holding us back is media conditioning. I do mean conditioning in the literal sense. Democrats are above reproach and unreachable.

I can also see a doctor developing an allergy to discussing politics in her office after how politicized medicine became during Covid.

Whitey gets a new holiday. Happy Juneteenth yall. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]Girondin [score hidden]  (0 children)

Read this book a while ago The Slave Narratives of Texas which is just a collection of first hand experiences of black people in slavery. Most of the stories were positive.

Odysee now has playlists by Drewski in technology

[–]Drewski[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Source? It seems like a pretty good platform to me.

Youtuber Pythos de Gothos: "Local Goth Club event ruined by SJWs" by ISaidWhatISaid in Gothic

[–]SerpensInferna 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God, I am so afraid of something like this happening to my local goth watering hole...

Taking a stand: I told my gynecologist to take "transgender" off of sex options by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]angelduster 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what I'd do if I went in for an exam, asked for a female doctor, and then saw someone who very clearly wasn't born female come into the room. I already have a bit of trauma involving older men, but for women who don't, I feel like they'd still react with confusion? But I would also still be thinking "ah yes, a female doctor, who was born male, socialized as male, and probably went through male puberty. Just like me."/s

I would hope that this is something that wouldn't happen very often, but that doesn't matter. The IDEA that it could happen is scary. I'm moderately left-leaning but my family members are more conservative and at the very least I'm able to talk with them about how ridiculous some of these "equality" laws are. Can't talk about this stuff with most of my friends though, they would be appalled if I had issues with seeing a doctor who identified as female but was born male.

Censorship Thursday - share your sub bans here! by NutterButterFlutter in LGBDropTheT

[–]TumbleweedFireflies 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In case anyone still has a Reddit account, and is a moderator or creator of a sub, Reddit is going to mass-delete/reclaim subs you've been squatting on if they haven't had any activity:

https://old.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/o18ct9/creating_new_opportunities_for_future_community

I'm curious to see what will happen to r/DropTheT. I assume it will be safe and continue to be squatted on, since Buddug is a powermod alt. But it would be amazing if he lost it. I don't even care at this point what it would become, it would just bring me glee and joy to see him stripped of it.

Anyway, hope y'all fellow squatters are either the sub creators, or made a post in the sub over the past year.

I'm going to lose several, including some I was helping hold for the r/detrans mods. Unfortunately, the creator long-since deleted his account, so we're not going to get a pass under Phase 2. I've reached out to the only other mod on the subs, since she's still a part of r/detrans, in hopes she can make a "Good Samaritan" request to keep them.

Whitey gets a new holiday. Happy Juneteenth yall. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]Girondin [score hidden]  (0 children)

interesting she hates susan b anthony, did some research and she apparently opposed the 15th (also elizabeth cady stanton) amendment and supposedly used racist rhetoric in order to get women's suffrage (black vote will be hindered by white female vote etc), I am not sure how true this framing is or she just wanted to get southern females also into the women's rights movements IDK.

I assume she hates lincoln do to him appeasing the south, some historians think he would be an Andrew Johnson appeaser or was a semi-racist who grifted abolitionist.

though I don't think she thinks that deep probably just cause their white.

Taking a stand: I told my gynecologist to take "transgender" off of sex options by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]BEB[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I swear that this gender ideology push is some kind of psy ops to turn the world even more chaotic than it is now.

Imagine in five years, when, as you said, the gynecologist is forced to give a pelvic exam to a faux-gina. And the receptionist has to repeatedly lie to elderly women that they are going to get a female doctor, but then said "woman" doctor has hands the size of basketballs and a beard.

Will the gynecologist think back on that strange, hippyish Karen (me) she had in her office warning her about gender ideology years before? Too late, lady. I was making sense - you should have listened.

Both: How do you feel about Title IX being changed to protect gender identity instead of biological sex? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]Fleurista 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm going to hope for the best, but prepare for the worst. This seems like a really awful idea, albeit born from good intentions (we hope). In the past I probably would have thought it was a wonderful display of inclusivity and true equality, but now I cringe. These poor girls don't deserve this. On one hand, it blows my mind that anyone could feel so entitled and bully others like this, but on the other it's not surprising seeing men use force and make a big stink to get what they want, especially if it means they can access female spaces and bodies.

Trans Karen hilariously explodes at fast-food employee for calling him "sir" (video) by SnowAssMan in GenderCriticalGuys

[–]MarkJefferson 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course "Commie DickGurl" is their name.

The sheer tone-deafness of this person posting a video of it thinking they'll get sympathy....

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]BEB 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She said that the office put "transgender" on the new patient form to make transgenders feel included, but of course she knew that biological sex was dimorphic.

To be fair, she was one of the best doctors I've been to - an obviously very intelligent woman - and, as I was spewing facts and figures about how mostly homosexual minors are the ones being sucked into the fad of transitioning, and giving her the details of how disastrous it was to their mental, emotional and physical well-being, I could tell she was processing it.

But then I mentioned that the Biden administration had just changed Title IX back to what Obama had changed it to, i.e., changed the definition of "sex" in Title IX to include "gender identity." This will mean that any US boy at an institution that accepts federal funds (or it might be any school) can self-ID as a female and enter girls' locker rooms/participate in girls' sports, etc.

The minute I criticized Gender Joe Biden, she snapped and said (I'm paraphrasing) "This office is free of politics" and then continued the examination as if I hadn't said a word.

As someone who remembers when Americans could DISCUSS the NUANCES of politics, and often come to some agreements, I am so sick of both sides marching in lockstep with their parties and never stopping to think critically about something as important as turning biology on its head to the detriment of impressionable GAY kids.

Especially when this movement to turn GAY kids into eunuchs is being push under the guise of supporting GAY rights.

The Six Million Dollar Nebularomantic DemiMan by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Three_oneFour 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Neurodivergent sounds like it was made up after someone watched the Divergent series and wanted to feel special because they don't think they fit in with anyone they know in real life. "Ooh, I'm not a candor like you, I'm neurodivergent"

And I fail to see how confusing platonic relationships for romantic puts you on the Aromantic spectrum? I've had that exact experience and I know for a fact that it was me being stupid and new to romantic/sexual feelings since I was a teenager at the time and not because I have a unique sexuality to where I don't know whether I want to sleep with all my friends or not. If anything, shouldn't it be hyperromantic?

Putin Asks If US Assassinated Ashli Babbitt:"450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress. They didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. Isn’t that persecution for political opinions?” by Tarrock in politics

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Wooz News on BitChute demonstrates how the "shooting" was a fake staged event like the more obvious Boston "bombing" crisis theater performance.

Whitey gets a new holiday. Happy Juneteenth yall. by radicalcentrist in debatealtright

[–]Richard_Parker [score hidden]  (0 children)

Make no mistake about it. This will be an annualized ritual to stepup the drum beat of white guilt. Cori Bush and others are not even flinching as they step up for demands for reparations.

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]BEB 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm older, of an era and place in which lesbians often proudly called themselves "dykes." If I were you, I would respond very sweetly, "I'm not an LGBTQ person, I'm a DYKE."

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]PatsyStone 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How did she respond?

Taking a stand: I told my gynecologist to take "transgender" off of sex options by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]tu_jode_mucho 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unfortunately this mess will only be curtailed once a good number of normies are affected. Once that receptionist can't proudly declare (honestly) that all practitioners are female and the gynos have to get educated about treating voluntary male surgical wounds, then we will finally see some real pushback. Sadly it may be a bit late in the game by then as far as reversing laws and such.

Primitivism, population decline or minimalism is suicidal and is wholly impractical by casparvoneverec in debatealtright

[–]Tiver [score hidden]  (0 children)

I struggle with that as well, ideally we would return to the middle ages, but if we do that, we get nuked by China.

How do you personally go about "Dropping the T" this month? by usehername in LGBDropTheT

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I crossed out "transgender" as a sex or gender option on the new patient form at my gynecologist and wrote in "biological sex is dimorphic in humans" (something like that).

Then I asked the gynecologist if she really thought that humans could change sex.

Then I told her that most children being sucked into the transgender fad are actually gay, and that lesbians, gays and bisexuals have formed organizations in part in order to save gay children from transitioning and becoming expensive and wretched lifetime medical experiments when they could have been happy and healthy gay adults instead.

Louie Gohmert Suggests Federal Agents Were Behind Capitol Attack by Pononimus in news

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No doubt about it. The press always cooperates with intel to spin any event any which way.

EEOC Celebrates Pride with a New "SOGI" Webpage by WildApples in GenderCritical

[–]BEB 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Compelled speech? We're in the US, so some conservative and or free speech org will challenge this.

With any luck, it will be the SCOPES trial redux, except this time the ACLU will be anti-science.

QT: If all these "third genders" around the world, throughout history, in all these different cultures are transgender, then where are all the gay people? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]Fleurista 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that just regarding sexuality and/or gender identity? I understand and agree with the spirit of what you're saying, but why would that apply to something like sexuality or gender identity but not something like race or disability or neurodiversity? I'm sorry to be pedantic, I'm just a bit confused 😅

A Disaster is Coming by Horrux in science

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Whoa Dude. Now I 😃 understand what you were talking about.

The Six Million Dollar Nebularomantic DemiMan by Chunkeeguy in LGBDropTheT

[–]Greykittymomma 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes! I have never been diagnosed but the sensory overload is what made me consider seeking a diagnosis. In the end I figured I survived this long and learned how to avoid people or loud places. I deal with depression, mania, obsessions and compulsions too but again, I don't make them someone else's problem!

Taking a stand: I told my gynecologist to take "transgender" off of sex options by BEB in GenderCritical

[–]BEB[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow - that's interesting about your family and friends.

I can totally relate - It is so incredibly frustrating that even someone who is liberal on just about every issue, like me, has to bend over backwards trying to convince people who've known me for decades that my opposition to gender ideology is not based on some kind of anti-LGB old school conservatism, but rather that opposition to gender ideology is the newest wave of feminism.

I kept pushing with the gynecologist because I could see that she was processing what I was saying. I mentioned the puberty blocker (or rather, the CHEMICAL CASTRATION DRUG) Lupron and how it was being given to this huge % of kids being swept up in the transgender fad and I could see her connecting the dots.

Here's the thing: I asked the receptionist for a female gynecologist and she proudly responded that they only had female practitioners (so physicians assistants, LPNs, etc) in the office so I didn't need to worry.

If the Equality Act passes, and this office has to hire a male, the receptionist won't be allowed to tell a patient requesting a female practitioner that she's going to get a male doctor, because, by law, the man is a woman.

So a patient will be undressed and waiting for her exam when in walks the "woman" doctor she requested, who she's been assured by the receptionist she's going to get, and it's a man.

It just frustrates me so much that, all over the world, the gender lobby has managed, by using LGB as sword and shield, to get people of goodwill to not think things through (or to be completely unaware - IRL NO ONE I know has heard of the US Equality Act) as to what the actual cost will be if we let men self-identify as women.