soapboxie.com

This is just why people in areas where resources are really scarce (arid/arctic/mountains) live just from pasturage. Animals can concentrate diluted plant sources which are ineffective to grow with intensive agriculture

The size of the human stomach isn't the limiting constraint in malnutrition. "Concentrating" nutrients in any way that loses any during the process exacerbates malnutrition. It doesn't ameliorate it.

Pasturage also makes grazing land more fertile.

Leaving a third of the farmland fallow rather than fertilize and plant reduces food production by about a third.

Yes, and such a production is truly least carbon dioxide demanding, we even don't need machines for to transport harvest from pastures.

Fertilizer manufacture, transport and spreading certainly has a carbon footprint. But there are people starving now. Dropping food production by a third shouldn't be a way of reducing emissions that we're looking at now.

Those who say that they hate the elites sound like hypocrites when they turn around and say that the globalists must be obeyed.

Your determinism is showing

I don't see how those questions demonstrate determinism.

An EV is much lower greenhouse emissions than an ICE vehicle.

There is an incentive for high mileage vehicles: the lower cost of running them.

The questions from above that you didn't address:

• How are people democratized by the ICE and not the BEV?

• How are people empowered by the ICE and not the BEV?

• How does owning a BEV result in you owning nothing?