On the same origin of quantum physics and general relativity from Riemannian geometry and Planck scale formalism (Preprint PDF)

To date, no globally accepted theory has been proposed to explain all physical observations. In this work, we reformulated the Riemannian geometry in terms of curvature and energy tensors using the Planck scale formalism. We proved that the Einstein field equation from general relativity is actually a relativistic quantum mechanical equation. We further modeled the universe using the equation with Einstein's lambda formalism and found that the universe dynamics could be considered as harmonic oscillators entangled with lambda curvature.

The proposed equation can be transformed into Dirac equations in electrodynamic and chromodynamic fields with a reduction in the background curvature. We redefined the mass and charge of leptons in terms of the interactions between the energy of the field and the curvature of the spacetime. The obtained equation is covariant in space–time and invariant with respect to any Planck scale. Therefore, the constants of the universe can be reduced to only two quantities: Planck length and Planck time.

On the same origin of quantum physics and general relativity from Riemannian geometry and Planck scale formalism (Preprint PDF)

To date, no globally accepted theory has been proposed to explain all physical observations. In this work, we reformulated the Riemannian geometry in terms of curvature and energy tensors using the Planck scale formalism. We proved that the Einstein field equation from general relativity is actually a relativistic quantum mechanical equation. We further modeled the universe using the equation with Einstein's lambda formalism and found that the universe dynamics could be considered as harmonic oscillators entangled with lambda curvature.

The proposed equation can be transformed into Dirac equations in electrodynamic and chromodynamic fields with a reduction in the background curvature. We redefined the mass and charge of leptons in terms of the interactions between the energy of the field and the curvature of the spacetime. The obtained equation is covariant in space–time and invariant with respect to any Planck scale. Therefore, the constants of the universe can be reduced to only two quantities: Planck length and Planck time. See also:

• Sabine Hossenfelder A New Theory of Everything Just Dropped! “Plack-scale invariant equation” there’s a typo here. This should have been italic. This should be an index. Ok, this is very sloppy copy-editing, which is generally a bad sign. It usually means that neither the reviewers nor the editors actually read the paper.

  They call the stress-energy tensor epsilon, it's normally written with a T, but ok. Then they throw away the second term. Which is a bad idea because that will violate energy conservation. Now they introduce the Planck energy, which they also call epsilon. That’s another bad idea. Next they assume something about a Lie Group, not sure which, and introduce a third epsilon. Oh no, now we have three different meanings for the same symbol... If there are any students listening, never use the same symbol for two different things.

  “We infer that if a mass can create a curvature [which they think follows from Einstein’s field equations] the curvature can also create a mass.”... This makes no sense, because Einstein’s field equations say nothing about creation, they simply say the distribution of mass and energy needs to fit to the curvature. They need to be equal. That’s why it’s called an equation. ...Unfortunately, as they said earlier correctly, the Ricci-tensor is symmetric and not anti-symmetric. So this is either a very screwed-up notation that actually refers to the Riemann tensor, or they don’t understand what they’re doing.

  Now they let’s see, contract this index and get the stress momentum tensor, haha. And then they contract it again and get, what, a gamma matrix where does that come from and a derivative acting on nothing which contracts to, guess what, epsilon... which is the energy of a photon. Not that it matters much at this point but energy is not a scalar. There are more typos here and here. This T wasn’t introduced and was maybe supposed to be Gamma, who knows. And now they’ve proved that the Ricci two tensor is actually a scalar.

  Ok, I think we can stop here. This is complete nonsense and should never have been published. Either way, this is an illustration of a much bigger problem. It’s that a lot of crap papers get published. And there are now so many crap papers being published that scientists have given up trying to combat this. They’re just trying their best to ignore it. The tragedy is of course, that somewhere in all that crap, there might be real wisdom. And we’d never know. Anyways, this paper we can safely forget about.

Wait a few decades, and it will be a well-known 'fact' that he was a trans African Muslim woman.