Entire announcement:

https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/urgent-hearing-dna-contamination-mrna-vaccines/

Sign up at the above URL!

The World Council for Health, in collaboration with expert advisers, is dedicated to providing the public with accurate and reliable information to promote health and well-being. In light of recent concerns regarding bacterial DNA and genetic sequences in mRNA vaccines, the World Council for Health has organized an Urgent Expert Hearing on this critical topic.

The hearing, moderated by World Council for Health Steering Committee members Dr Mark Trozzi and Christof Plothe, DO, will take place virtually on October 9th at worldcouncilforhealth.org/dna and aims to address the implications of these findings for all people of the world.

International expert panel: Kevin McKernan, Dr Janci Lindsay, Prof Sucharit Bhakdi, Assoc Prof Byram Bridle, Dr Peter McCullough, Prof Brigitte König and Dr Jessica Rose

...

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. You know the tree by its fruit.

Excerpt:

...

In my new book, The Identity Trap, I trace where this ideology originated and how it became so powerful. While I have fundamental disagreements with the thinkers whose work helped to inspire this tradition, I found their concerns to be reasonable and their work to be serious. But then their ideas entered the mainstream in the most viral—and, often, the most vulgar—possible form.

The insights of Michel Foucault inspired the bromides of Robin DiAngelo. The concerns of Derrick Bell turned into the Manichean slogans of Ibram X. Kendi.

Even at their best, these ideas are a trap. While they promise to eradicate injustices and create a better world, they make it more difficult to realize the traditional aspirations of the left. The adoption of these ideas has made it harder for progressive organizations to fulfill their missions. It has led to the adoption of public policies that actively harmed the poor and marginalized people it was supposed to serve. And far from being the most effective bulwark against the danger from the far-right, their ascendancy is a key reason why Donald Trump is now running head-to-head with Joe Biden in polls for the 2024 election. Theoretically speaking, right-wing populism and the identity trap may be adversaries; in practical and political terms, one is the yin to the other’s yang.

The corrosive influence of the identity trap can now be felt in many areas of our public and political life. The popularized version of this novel ideology is putting healthy forms of cultural exchange under a general pall of suspicion. It is responsible for dangerous attacks on the norms sustaining a genuine culture of free speech. It has helped to inspire the practice of “progressive separatism,” leading influential institutions from elementary schools to nonprofit organizations to create racially segregated “affinity groups.” And it is behind the rise and rise of the idea of equity, which mandates positive discrimination to eradicate all disparities in outcomes between different groups, pitting different ethnic groups against each other in a zero-sum competition for resources.

Each of these applications is important in its own right; indeed, I respond to all four in my new book. But a fifth, though more abstract and philosophical, is even more foundational: the claim, originally inspired by Kimberlé Crenshaw’s concept of intersectionality, that somebody who stands at one intersection of identities cannot understand somebody who stands at another intersection of identities—and should, especially if the latter comes from a more oppressed group, defer to their political judgment.

Why So Many Now Believe that We Just Can’t Understand Each Other

For centuries, the political left cherished a humanist tradition that emphasized the ability of different people to understand each other. Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum puto, a character in a much-quoted play by the ancient Roman playwright Terence said: “I am human, and nothing human is alien to me.”

But of late, a big part of the left—and, increasingly, much of the mainstream—has turned on universalism. Invocations of Terrence have gradually been supplanted by an emphasis on the way in which the members of privileged groups, like straight white men, are incapable of understanding the experiences of oppressed groups.

...

There is significant variation in the exact nature of these views. But four interlocking claims are particularly central to the forms of standpoint theory that now routinely influence public debate:

• There is a set of significant experiences that (virtually) all members of (particular) oppressed groups share.
• These experiences give members of the group special insight into the nature of their oppression and other socially relevant facts.
• Members of the group cannot fully or satisfactorily communicate these experiences to outsiders, even insofar as they have important political implications.
• When an oppressed group makes political demands based on the identity its members share, outsiders should defer to them.

Do these claims hold water?

Why Standpoint Theory Is Philosophically Wrong

The first core claim of standpoint theory runs into trouble because it is extremely hard to identify meaningful experiences that all members of a socially relevant group share. Feminist philosophers originally tried to ground the special perspective of women in the fact that they have historically been expected to be in charge of rearing children, for example. But other feminist philosophers such as Elizabeth Spelman soon pointed out that there have, all through history, been many women who never had children. In a similar vein, men may be less likely to raise children on their own than women, but it is not clear why any particular single dad should have less insight into the burden of caregiving than any particular single mom. As Rachel Fraser, an associate professor of philosophy at Oxford University who herself defends a more moderate form of standpoint epistemology, told me on the Persuasion podcast, “You’re going to have to abandon the simple idea that there’s some kind of experiential core that all and only women have.”

...

Warning: The OP writer is a bit of a windbag.

Wait, are they trying to tell U.S. citizens:

A nation who's govt was determined to shut down NEARLY ALL heavy industry and resource extractions domestically, AND outsource critical bits to foreign nations potentially-not-allies, THEN send off virtually all stockpiled ammo and mil equipment to be blown up after seeing minimal to no offensive use, AFTER drawing down the strategic oil reserves to basically zero while ALSO refusing to purchase lower cost replacement volume at the dip, AS WELL AS both shutting down domestic extraction and tightly limiting expanding or adding refineries...

....A nation who set a PRIMARY GOAL 2 years ago of gutting their Armed Forces of any career or conservative or honestly white male in any rank and refusing to recruit more, while actively ATTEMPTING TO recruit from sub groups notorious for being far less active duty ready, let alone capable.of being made into in fighting condition, and has EMBRACED Woke Leadership, Narratives, Indoctrination ideology aggressively...

THAT Nation is likely to suffer brutal and complete destruction of humans and equipment sent to war, and definitely at the hands of a large nation with the advantage of being on their own home continent vs across a sea and land masses from the conflict zone, a nation who has done none of those self-defeating things ?

Nah, can't be! 💁🙃

our life expectancy at birth is about 26

I think we should end our conversation, unless you can prove this claim. I suspect you can only cite a source that says they believe this and that, using phrases like evolution, which is an idea that is impossible to prove with the scientific method. Your statement remains a belief, and I acknowledge that my belief is different. I believe that man is much weaker, sicker, and has only a fraction of the lifespan of the first men on Earth.

Our adversary would like to remove all remembrance of God and his historical account, which has so far survived thousands of years and includes a message of hope for eternal life in light and strength, for all who repent and turn to Jesus for salvation.