The Egyptian Pyramids—Connection to Rain and Nile Flood Anomalie

This paper explores rain and Nile flood anomalies observed in Dynastic Egypt. The notion of the pyramids influencing weather takes its roots in the work of esteemed physicist Charles Wilson. It proposes that a combination of religious practices and pyramid function related to rainmaking played a significant role in influencing climatic conditions. To support the claims, the paper presents experimental results that provide empirical evidence. Finally, the paper concludes by presenting historical evidence that bolsters the proposed hypothesis, leveraging the facts about Egyptian civilization and its practices.

It is proposed that pyramids had a deeper purpose: they could be used to induce rain. In 1895, Charles Wilson, a physicist, meteorologist, and Nobel Prize winner proved that rain could be artificially created. The key idea in making rain is that a generation of the negative electric charge in the quartz contained by the soil leads to its accumulation to the atmosphere. The negative electric charge in the atmosphere in turn facilitates the formation of water droplets around them and eventually this induces rain. See also:

Were the Pyramids Nuclear Reactors? Pyramids could act like retro-reflectors of dark matter radiation concentrated by Earth and speeding up various processes including low energy nuclear reactions (potassium beta decay and others). Has anyone tested the Great Pyramid sarcophagus for Calcium-41 and Aluminium-26? Pyramid power effects patented by Czech radioamateour Karel Drbal allegedly require quite thorough orientation of pyramid body with respect to Earth axis.

Pseudoskepticism is a position that appears to be that of skepticism or scientific skepticism but in reality is a form of dogmatism. Marcello Truzzi attributed the following characteristics to pseudoskeptics::

• Denying, when only doubt has been established
• Double standards in the application of criticism
• The tendency to discredit rather than investigate
• Presenting insufficient evidence or proof
• Assuming criticism requires no burden of proof
• Making unsubstantiated counter-claims
• Counter-claims based on plausibility rather than empirical evidence
• Suggesting that unconvincing evidence provides grounds for completely dismissing a claim

Truzzi characterized true skepticism as:

• Acceptance of doubt when neither assertion nor denial has been established
• No burden of proof to take an agnostic position
• Agreement that the corpus of established knowledge must be based on what is proved, but recognising its incompleteness
• Even-handedness in requirement for proofs, whatever their implication
• Accepting that a failure of a proof in itself proves nothing

The shear hypocrisy of it all.

What?

That's absolutely true. The tax and gun charges faced by Biden are almost never brought if the gun was never used and the tax was paid back.

Just Putin winning control of the US as part of the war.

Former U.S. spies warned in 2020 that the Hunter Biden scandal had Russian fingerprints. They feel vindicated now.

Scientists Converting Cars to Run on Invasive Seaweed

I was just joking.

What is Social Skepticism? Social skepticism simply put, is the activist-minded exploitation and abuse of science by means of its vulnerable underlying philosophy, skepticism. See also:

The Decline Effect and Why Scientific 'Truth' So Often Turns Out Wrong In this context the reading of articles The era of expert failure by Arnold Kling,  Why experts are usually wrong by David H. Freeman and Why the experts missed the crash by Phill Tetlock may be useful.

Those who say that the USA is a free and peaceful country with a balanced budget are liars.

Anti matter isn't found so much as it's synthesized in a partical accelerator and needs to be kept suspended in a magnetic field to prevent it from coming into contact with matter.

As such you can at most only synthesize a few particles at a time and it is extremely expensive to produce and store. So it probably is the "most expensive material" humans can produce but it's practically worthless outside of research since doing literally anything with it destroys it. Also it's not necessarily "rare" as it's easy as fuck to make it's just expensive as fuck to do so and store it.

You smack particles together it gets made naturally. Cosmic ray collisions make it on earth all the time. All anti matter is is normal matter with an opposite electrical charge. Positrons instead of electrons basically. But since they attract matter and self annihilate as soon as they come into existence they basically get destroyed.

I grew up in a middle-class family and we had a nice toilet room and a lawn.

Sounds good to me. If we stop sacrificing babies to Satan than God will give us major economic buffs. It's pretty simple. If women are unhappy about living in a country where they can't choose to abort their baby then they can be unhappy.