I'm directly asking you a question and you tried to dodge it with some tangent about Palestine...

It's been two days since you wrote this

Next week: photos of holhol soldiers

In five more will you agree that you were wrong?

How could you possibly think that ruzzia have a ground force doctrine which is anything but criminally negligent? Can you explain, because that makes zero sense

Ooooo I want mine on my forehead! 🤡

The actual reality is:

• Depending on the study, around 90% or more of teens suffering from gender dysphoria grow out of it within a few years, most of whom become perfectly well-adjusted gays and lesbians.
• Among those who don't grow out of it, there is little good quality scientific evidence that transitioning is effective at reducing depression or anxiety. Outside of a short-term euphoria following surgery, there is little or no difference in levels of depression and anxiety among those who have transitioned versus those who haven't.
• Transitioning makes very little difference to suicidal ideation, self-harm and suicide even in cases where it does reduce anxiety, dysphoria and depression.
• The objectively better the study, the less benefit it tends to show: most studies showing positive outcomes have serious weaknesses and biases, such as small sample sizes, high rates of patients lost to followup, or only following patients during the short period of euphoria after surgery.
• Puberty blockers and transitioning comes with large risks of severe medical complications and side-effects, some of which are horrific.
• Many detransitioners report a pattern of medical abuse and unethical conduct associated with "affirming care": little or no discussion of possible side effects, surgeons ghosting patients who are dissatisfied with the results of surgery, serious complications, etc.

I'm not saying that absolutely nobody should transition. But the vast increase in "trans", especially the marketing of it at teenage girls and the use of the affirming model is as pure a case of Follow The Money as you can hope to see. Transitioning teens is hugely profitable. It is not driven by medical best practices.

Pay them a visit.

woot!

For the sheeple, changing how they see things is nigh impossible.

Nice clickbait trash you got here.

The problem with age-gating the internet is that it's nearly impossible to enforce for "less legitimate" websites or overseas websites that don't care. And any effective age-gating will essentially destroy online privacy (well what little remains of it) and have a chilling effect across the internet.

Again China bans porn, along with all sorts of other content the government doesn't want people there to see. It's all easily bypassed with a VPN and the government can't do shit to stop it nor do they care, since anyone publicly talking about it can just get hauled off.

Aww, thanks bro <3

So how can I help you today?

Unplug yourself.

Parents should control their children to protect them from harm from viewing as they should keep them from walking into traffic or drinking bleach.

The law should be protecting people from being trafficked.

Allowing controls such as this is loss of privacy and additional monitoring and control over all of us.

Pretty sure that as a shill you know that your argument is stupid, though.