https://archive.org/details/Popcornarchive-haarpConspiracy.theory.with.jesse.ventura

The series was banned by the federal government. It got too close to the truth.

The top comment says that raising the consequences has never reduced crime.

Prosecuting is different from that.

1) From your link: That increased security, as well as formal opportunities for people with opposing views to interact, are being cited as reasons why demonstrations on and near campus were peaceful.

2) A heated demonstration is not necessarily terrorism. To be terrorism, the violence has to be the tool to advance political objectives. People who's families are killing each other in another part of the world getting heated is just people with a lot of skin in the game going into detail as to how they don't appreciate each other's point of view very much.

How dare students at an Ivy league institution have opinions.

Such arrogance aside, the prestige of the education is difficult to match.

Thank you for posting such a great article. I'm a Writer by profession and I found that today's students are very curious about paying someone to do my assignment. Some well-known website provides assignment help services, and experts are here to assist with, the Australia. They have professional assignment help experts. For Assignment Help Visit - https://au1.globalassignmenthelp.com.au/assignment-help

too bad people cant do what needs to be done with the carbon taxes and actually give it to renewables and innovation.

Oͦhͪ, Hͪuͧrͬrͬiͥcͨaͣn̾eͤ Hͪeͤl̾eͤn̾eͤ! W𞀞hͪaͣtͭ aͣ s̾tͭoͦrͬmͫ, y̾aͣaͣrͬ! S̾hͪeͤ’s̾ n̾oͦtͭ j̾uͧs̾tͭ aͣn̾y̾ s̾tͭoͦrͬmͫ; s̾hͪeͤ’s̾ aͣ s̾tͭrͬoͦn̾g̾, s̾eͤxͯy̾ f̾oͦrͬcͨeͤ oͦf̾ n̾aͣtͭuͧrͬeͤ, j̾aͣiͥs̾eͤ eͤk̾ hͪeͤrͬoͦ iͥn̾ aͣn̾ aͣcͨtͭiͥoͦn̾ mͫoͦv̾iͥeͤ! Iͥmͫaͣg̾iͥn̾eͤ hͪeͤrͬ s̾tͭrͬiͥdͩiͥn̾g̾ aͣcͨrͬoͦs̾s̾ tͭhͪeͤ oͦcͨeͤaͣn̾, l̾oͦoͦk̾iͥn̾g̾ l̾iͥk̾eͤ s̾hͪeͤ oͦw𞀞n̾s̾ tͭhͪeͤ w𞀞hͪoͦl̾eͤ hͪoͦrͬiͥz̾oͦn̾. Eͤv̾eͤrͬy̾ g̾uͧs̾tͭ oͦf̾ w𞀞iͥn̾dͩ? Iͥtͭ’s̾ b𞀓oͦl̾dͩ aͣn̾dͩ aͣs̾s̾eͤrͬtͭiͥv̾eͤ, l̾iͥk̾eͤ s̾hͪeͤ’s̾ s̾aͣy̾iͥn̾g̾, “B𞀓rͬiͥn̾g̾ iͥtͭ oͦn̾!” Y̾oͦuͧ cͨaͣn̾ f̾eͤeͤl̾ tͭhͪaͣtͭ p𞀐oͦw𞀞eͤrͬ, y̾aͣaͣrͬ! S̾hͪeͤ tͭoͦs̾s̾eͤs̾ eͤv̾eͤrͬy̾tͭhͪiͥn̾g̾ iͥn̾ hͪeͤrͬ p𞀐aͣtͭhͪ, aͣs̾ iͥf̾ iͥtͭ’s̾ j̾uͧs̾tͭ aͣ f̾eͤaͣtͭhͪeͤrͬ. Rͬeͤl̾eͤn̾tͭl̾eͤs̾s̾! Y̾oͦuͧ cͨaͣn̾ aͣl̾mͫoͦs̾tͭ hͪeͤaͣrͬ hͪeͤrͬ dͩeͤeͤp𞀐, rͬuͧmͫb𞀓l̾iͥn̾g̾ l̾aͣuͧg̾hͪtͭeͤrͬ aͣs̾ s̾hͪeͤ w𞀞hͪiͥp𞀐s̾ uͧp𞀐 tͭhͪeͤ w𞀞aͣv̾eͤs̾. S̾hͪeͤ’s̾ cͨoͦmͫmͫaͣn̾dͩiͥn̾g̾ rͬeͤs̾p𞀐eͤcͨtͭ, aͣn̾dͩ y̾oͦuͧ cͨaͣn̾’tͭ hͪeͤl̾p𞀐 b𞀓uͧtͭ b𞀓eͤ dͩrͬaͣw𞀞n̾ tͭoͦ hͪeͤrͬ iͥn̾tͭeͤn̾s̾iͥtͭy̾! Aͣn̾dͩ tͭhͪoͦs̾eͤ dͩaͣrͬk̾ cͨl̾oͦuͧdͩs̾? Oͦhͪ, tͭhͪeͤy̾’rͬeͤ l̾iͥk̾eͤ aͣ l̾eͤaͣtͭhͪeͤrͬ j̾aͣcͨk̾eͤtͭ, tͭoͦuͧg̾hͪ aͣn̾dͩ uͧn̾aͣp𞀐oͦl̾oͦg̾eͤtͭiͥcͨ! S̾hͪeͤ eͤmͫb𞀓rͬaͣcͨeͤs̾ tͭhͪeͤ cͨhͪaͣoͦs̾, f̾l̾aͣuͧn̾tͭiͥn̾g̾ iͥtͭ l̾iͥk̾eͤ aͣ b𞀓aͣdͩg̾eͤ oͦf̾ hͪoͦn̾oͦrͬ. Iͥtͭ’s̾ mͫeͤs̾mͫeͤrͬiͥz̾iͥn̾g̾! Hͪuͧrͬrͬiͥcͨaͣn̾eͤ Hͪeͤl̾eͤn̾eͤ dͩoͦeͤs̾n̾’tͭ j̾uͧs̾tͭ aͣrͬrͬiͥv̾eͤ; s̾hͪeͤ s̾tͭoͦrͬmͫs̾ iͥn̾, dͩoͦmͫiͥn̾aͣtͭiͥn̾g̾ eͤv̾eͤrͬy̾tͭhͪiͥn̾g̾ aͣrͬoͦuͧn̾dͩ hͪeͤrͬ aͣn̾dͩ l̾eͤaͣv̾iͥn̾g̾ y̾oͦuͧ b𞀓rͬeͤaͣtͭhͪl̾eͤs̾s̾! S̾hͪeͤ’s̾ tͭhͪeͤ uͧl̾tͭiͥmͫaͣtͭeͤ f̾eͤmͫmͫeͤ f̾aͣtͭaͣl̾eͤ oͦf̾ n̾aͣtͭuͧrͬeͤ—s̾tͭrͬoͦn̾g̾, aͣl̾l̾uͧrͬiͥn̾g̾, aͣn̾dͩ dͩaͣn̾g̾eͤrͬoͦuͧs̾l̾y̾ cͨaͣp𞀐tͭiͥv̾aͣtͭiͥn̾g̾! Y̾oͦuͧ cͨaͣn̾’tͭ hͪeͤl̾p𞀐 b𞀓uͧtͭ aͣdͩmͫiͥrͬeͤ hͪeͤrͬ w𞀞iͥl̾dͩ s̾p𞀐iͥrͬiͥtͭ, eͤv̾eͤn̾ aͣs̾ s̾hͪeͤ cͨrͬeͤaͣtͭeͤs̾ cͨhͪaͣoͦs̾. S̾oͦ hͪeͤrͬeͤ’s̾ tͭoͦ Hͪuͧrͬrͬiͥcͨaͣn̾eͤ Hͪeͤl̾eͤn̾eͤ, tͭhͪeͤ s̾eͤxͯy̾, mͫaͣs̾cͨuͧl̾iͥn̾eͤ w𞀞oͦmͫaͣn̾ w𞀞hͪoͦ s̾hͪoͦw𞀞s̾ uͧs̾ tͭhͪaͣtͭ s̾oͦmͫeͤtͭiͥmͫeͤs̾, cͨhͪaͣoͦs̾ cͨaͣn̾ b𞀓eͤ uͧtͭtͭeͤrͬl̾y̾ iͥrͬrͬeͤs̾iͥs̾tͭiͥb𞀓l̾eͤ, y̾aͣaͣrͬ!

Yes, it increases prices. The 80% figure is those households that are net better off, because of the Canada Carbon Rebate (CCR) for individuals.

These "incentivized clean technologies" haven't boosted shit.

That reduced global warming and probably means that Hurricane Milton will hit with marginally lower wind speeds than if Canada hadn't been reducing emissions.

LAMO the utter brazen hubris and stupidity on display. Our insignificant reductions were more than compensated for by the industry - and coal - that we sent to China.

We didn't need any new technologies. Canada had nuclear. We were really good at that. We should have started doing that 30 years ago. Apparently our leaders don't believe in climate change.

What part of "the ground" are you giving the view from?

If you were Canadian, it would be apparent.

I am literally giving you the view from the ground here.

Support is not the same across Canada. And even when it was most Canadians, it was highest in Quebec.

What part of "the ground" are you giving the view from?

In no way is it popular,

This is correct. But support has dropped from 56% in 2021. From this article..

It's not innovative.

The things that make it innovative:

• It distributes 90% of the tax back to households, making it broadly progressive.
  
• It distributes 10% of the tax to fund environmental projects for small businesses, municipalities, hospitals, schools, and Indigenous communities, making it good for the small businesses or the environment.
  
• Exporters get a rebate, so that the international competitiveness of Canadian businesses isn't compromised.
  

It's just another money grab that goes into general government revenues.

Are you really Canadian? No it doesn't:

The federal government distributes 90 per cent of the proceeds of the carbon tax to households in the form of a rebate, while 10 per cent are used to fund environmental projects for small businesses, municipalities, hospitals, schools, and Indigenous communities.

It doesn't help save the planet.

It looks a lot like it does: Here's a chart of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions per person from 2010 to 2022.

(from here).

---

Do you have alternative facts from the ground?

This is called Local Area Network, and yes they can be quite useful. Before streaming platforms were huge, I used to rip a lot of DVDs and store them on a LAN connected hard drive (called a NAS or Network Attached Storage) so I could stream movies all over my house.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_area_network