https://archive.ph/7KPvF

There will be no desirable future from the IMF and the World Bank, which will not change because the United States has veto power over every important decision. We need alternatives to the IMF and the World Bank, democratic institutions that support feminist, anti-racist and radically ecological alternatives. A bank in the South that lends at 0% for projects that promote such a shift is one example.

The IMF's job is to keep poorer nations in debt slavery.

They are what they accuse falsely the Chinese of being.

https://archive.ph/VxCrH

Seems like the whole BIden family is deeply corrupt. Yeah, this is being done by the GOP for their own ends, but that doesn't change the fact that Hunter Biden is deeply corrupt.

https://archive.ph/BTivf

It's likely that these will soon be a priority target for Hamas, assuming this plan isn't totally crazy.

But the ethno-state, the ethno-supremacy, the apartheid, the occupation, etc., need to be defended. It's UNDER ATTACK from people who think the Zionist Apartheid State of Israel is unjust, oppression, with plenty of baseless violence.

Exactly this. I wageslave for chump change and for what

"Let's not forget [...] free speech"

"Removed by moderators"

This picture perfectly encapsulate Reddit

Nope.

Americans laugh when New York outlaws ketchup, but do you think ketchup bans in New York might lead to ketchup bans in Vermont and Kansas?

Do you think ketchup bans might lead to mustard bans and toothpick bans?

Do you think that the Satanists are going wake up and restore the Bill of Rights, decrease the debt, or end the wars?

Does anyone see what is going on?

Wow you must be one of them idiots sitting in your car at the Starbucks drive through every morning. I was IBEW #3 for 20 years, you can't fire lazy workers but you can write them up for arriving late, failure to take calls, rude to co workers and customers and always crying I live pay check to pay check.

You just don't get it, either they are woke or lose investors and finances, and their stock tumbles. Disney and Netflix face the same problems, so they replace white characters with more diverse characters. Trying to be carbon neutral is expensive, calling white people Nazis is easier and cheaper to do.

I didn't even have to look it up, but, of course he was funded by Soros.

https://thephiladelphiacitizen.org/guest-commentary-george-soros-bad-bet-on-progressive-prosecutors/

They launched the site in June 2005. They did not add Christopher Slowe and merge with Aaron Swartz's company, Infogami, until the period of Nov 2005 - Jan 2006.

Clouds behave like a greenhouse.

Not exactly. It's important for a greenhouse that it's made of glass or something that is transparent to visible light, so that the energy from the sun mostly enters. If you had an opaque white greenhouse, it wouldn't be warmer.

During the day clouds have a cooling effect, because a lot of the sun's energy reflects off them and doesn't make it to the surface. During the night they keep it warmer by reflecting the earth's energy back to the earth.

The total effect of clouds is a cooler surface than if we had no clouds. But the effect of a particular cloud depends on its height, its color and the time of day. High clouds warm, overall, low clouds cool, overall. Night clouds warm. Day clouds cool. Dark clouds are less reflective than light ones.

Like the blanket analogy you used.

I notice the blanket only weighs about 0.04% of your house, but you don't argue that "therefore it can't warm, because it's trivial beyond accounting."

CO2 doesn't behave like this. It's transparent for the majority of the spectrum.

FFS. The majority of the spectrum doesn't matter does it, because the earth emits as a body at 20°C: Most energy between about 300 and 1300 waves per centimeter. And peaking at about 600 waves per centimeter. So the CO2 abosrbance band from about 600 to 750 waves per centimeter is massively significant, as the graph of the emission of a black body at 20°C, and the earth's emissios measured at the top of the atmosphere that I link to above clearly shows.

Are we pretending that as part of not understanding the greenhouse effect, we don't understand black-body radiation?

The earth emits energy at greatest energy spectral density right where one of the the CO₂ absorption bands is

It's more or less legit for clouds, but it's a false lable that's applied for political reasons to CO2.

Other way around, mate:

Clouds are complicated, but overall they cool.

CO₂ warms, causing about 3°C warming per doubling at equilibrium.

And that is denied for economic reasons. The fossil fuel industry is the most lucrative on the planet.

Here's that NASA link about clouds for kids, at a level that's in keeping with us pretending we don't understand the greenhouse effect.